Literature DB >> 17987574

Laparoscopic management of ureteral calculi: a report of 123 cases.

Naser Simforoosh1, Abbas Basiri, Abdol Karim Danesh, Seyed Amir Mohsen Ziaee, Farzaneh Sharifiaghdas, Ali Tabibi, Hamidreza Abdi, Farhat Farrokhi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery for the management of ureteral calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed 123 laparoscopic calculus removal in 103 men and 31 women. Indications for the procedure were extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or transureteral lithotomy failure and large calculus. The mean age of the patients was 39.6 +/- 13.8 years. The calculi were between 1 and 5.6 cm and located in the upper, middle, and lower ureter in 90 (73.2%), 20 (16.3%), and 13 (10.5%) patients, respectively. Ureteral stent was used in 52 (42.3%) patients. We used 3 ports for camera and instruments. Intraperitoneal approach was used in 104 (84.6%) and extraperitoneal in 19 (15.4%).
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 143.2 +/- 60.5 minutes. One hundred and nineteen patients (96.7%) became stone free. Minor complications occurred in 14 (11.4%) patients. Conversion to open surgery was required in 1 patient due to migration of the calculus to the peritoneum after removal from the ureter. Intra-abdominal hematoma led to reoperation 1 day after the surgery in 1 patient. Operative time was different significantly between extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches (171.3 +/- 91.3 minutes and 137.3 +/- 52.2 minutes, respectively; P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic removal of ureteral calculi in selected groups of patients, taking the advantage of this minimally invasive procedure such as better cosmetic results and patient's satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17987574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol J        ISSN: 1735-1308            Impact factor:   1.510


  8 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

Review 2.  The role of open and laparoscopic stone surgery in the modern era of endourology.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India.

Authors:  Manish Garg; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Satya N Sankhwar; Manoj Kumar; Amit Kumar; Jai Prakash; Pradeep Kumar; Mohit Pandey
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-10-30

4.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stones.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Sayyad
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-01

5.  Laparoscopic stone surgery with the aid of flexible nephroscopy.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Jung; Sung Yong Cho; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyeon Jeong; Hwancheol Son; Seung Hyo Woo; Dae Kyung Kim; Sun-Ho Min; Seung-June Oh; Hyeon-Hoe Kim; Seung Bae Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-07-11

6.  Using retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted upper ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Bo Jia; Jiayuan Liu; Bo Hu; Zhaohui Chen
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-01

7.  Laparoscopic management of distal ureteric stones in a bilharzial ureter: Results of a single-centre prospective study.

Authors:  Hani H Nour; Samir E Elgobashy; Amr Elkholy; Ahmad M Kamal; Mamdouh A Roshdy; Ahmad G Elbaz; Essam Riad
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-07-31

8.  Efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of large proximal ureteric stones and its impact on renal function.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Atsushi Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Kazumi Taguchi; Ryosuke Ando; Kentaro Mizuno; Yasunori Itoh; Keiichi Tozawa; Yutaro Hayashi; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-11-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.