Literature DB >> 17987399

Impact of preadmission variables on USMLE step 1 and step 2 performance.

James Kleshinski1, Sadik A Khuder, Joseph I Shapiro, Jeffrey P Gold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the predictive ability of preadmission variables on United States Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE) step 1 and step 2 performance, incorporating the use of a neural network model.
METHOD: Preadmission data were collected on matriculants from 1998 to 2004. Linear regression analysis was first used to identify predictors of performance on step 1 and step 2. A generalized regression neural network (GRNN) as well as a feed forward neural network (FFNN) was then developed in an effort to more accurately predict step 1 and step 2 scores from these preadmission data.
RESULTS: Statistically significant predictors for step 1 and step 2 included science grade point average (SGPA), the biologic science (BS) section of the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT), college selectivity, race, and age of the applicant. Neural networks were found to predict a significant portion of the variance, and the FFNN demonstrated some superiority over that obtained with linear regression models as well as the GRNN.
CONCLUSIONS: The results have implications that could impact the selection of applicants to medical school and the neural networks that we developed could be used in a prospective manner.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17987399     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9087-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  15 in total

1.  Neurology clerkship goals and their effect on learning and satisfaction.

Authors:  Roy E Strowd; Rachel Marie E Salas; Tiana E Cruz; Charlene E Gamaldo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  A national cohort study of U.S. medical school students who initially failed Step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination.

Authors:  Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Prematriculation variables associated with suboptimal outcomes for the 1994-1999 cohort of US medical school matriculants.

Authors:  Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The future is in the numbers: the power of predictive analysis in the biomedical educational environment.

Authors:  Charles A Gullo
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-07-01

5.  A Predictive Model for USMLE Step 1 Scores.

Authors:  Christin Giordano; David Hutchinson; Richard Peppler
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-09-07

6.  Perceived causes of differential attainment in UK postgraduate medical training: a national qualitative study.

Authors:  Katherine Woolf; Antonia Rich; Rowena Viney; Sarah Needleman; Ann Griffin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Risk assessment of student performance in the International Foundations of Medicine Clinical Science Examination by the use of statistical modeling.

Authors:  Michael C David; Diann S Eley; Jennifer Schafer; Leo Davies
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-12-02

8.  Self-reported study habits for enhancing medical students' performance in the National Medical Unified Examination.

Authors:  Amr Idris; Tareq Al Saadi; Basel Edris; Bisher Sawaf; Mhd Ismael Zakaria; Mahmoud Alkhatib; Tarek Turk
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance.

Authors:  Francis Deng; Jeffrey A Gluckstein; Douglas P Larsen
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

10.  Predicting United States Medical Licensure Examination Step 2 clinical knowledge scores from previous academic indicators.

Authors:  Kristina A Monteiro; Paul George; Richard Dollase; Luba Dumenco
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.