CONTEXT: Although racial and ethnic differences in vitamin D status and bone mineral density (BMD) are recognized, less is known about how differences in vitamin D status impact BMD, especially among men. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the relation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and BMD by race and ethnic group. DESIGN: We conducted a population-based, observational survey. PARTICIPANTS: PARTICIPANTS included 1114 Black, Hispanic, and White men, 30-79 yr of age. OUTCOMES: We assessed 25(OH)D by a competitive protein binding assay and BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean age +/- SD of the 331 Black, 362 Hispanic, and 421 White men was 48 +/- 12.8 yr. Mean 25(OH)D was lower among Black (25.0 +/- 14.7 ng/ml) and Hispanic (32.9 +/- 13.9 ng/ml) men compared with White men (37.4 +/- 14.0 ng/ml, P < 0.01). A higher percentage of both Black (44%) and Hispanic (23%) men had levels of 25(OH)D in the lowest quartile, compared with 11% of White men (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, height, and weight, only White men showed significant positive correlation between 25(OH)D and BMD (range of correlations, 0.00-0.14). Serum 25(OH)D was not associated with BMD in Black or Hispanic men at any bone site. Results were similar when adjusted for age only. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm substantial racial and ethnic group differences in BMD and serum 25(OH)D in men. Serum 25(OH)D and BMD are significantly related to one another in White men only. This may have implications for evaluation of bone health and supplementation in men with low levels of 25(OH)D. Further understanding of the biological mechanisms for these differences between race and ethnic groups is needed.
CONTEXT: Although racial and ethnic differences in vitamin D status and bone mineral density (BMD) are recognized, less is known about how differences in vitamin D status impact BMD, especially among men. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the relation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and BMD by race and ethnic group. DESIGN: We conducted a population-based, observational survey. PARTICIPANTS: PARTICIPANTS included 1114 Black, Hispanic, and White men, 30-79 yr of age. OUTCOMES: We assessed 25(OH)D by a competitive protein binding assay and BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean age +/- SD of the 331 Black, 362 Hispanic, and 421 White men was 48 +/- 12.8 yr. Mean 25(OH)D was lower among Black (25.0 +/- 14.7 ng/ml) and Hispanic (32.9 +/- 13.9 ng/ml) men compared with White men (37.4 +/- 14.0 ng/ml, P < 0.01). A higher percentage of both Black (44%) and Hispanic (23%) men had levels of 25(OH)D in the lowest quartile, compared with 11% of White men (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, height, and weight, only White men showed significant positive correlation between 25(OH)D and BMD (range of correlations, 0.00-0.14). Serum 25(OH)D was not associated with BMD in Black or Hispanic men at any bone site. Results were similar when adjusted for age only. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm substantial racial and ethnic group differences in BMD and serum 25(OH)D in men. Serum 25(OH)D and BMD are significantly related to one another in White men only. This may have implications for evaluation of bone health and supplementation in men with low levels of 25(OH)D. Further understanding of the biological mechanisms for these differences between race and ethnic groups is needed.
Authors: Yue Fang; Joyce B J van Meurs; Arnold d'Alesio; Mila Jhamai; Hongyan Zhao; Fernando Rivadeneira; Albert Hofman; Johannes P T van Leeuwen; Frédéric Jehan; Huibert A P Pols; André G Uitterlinden Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Michael F Holick; Ethel S Siris; Neil Binkley; Mary K Beard; Aliya Khan; Jennifer T Katzer; Richard A Petruschke; Erluo Chen; Anne E de Papp Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-03-29 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Robin L Fullman; Katie L Stone; Joseph M Zmuda; Douglas C Bauer; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kristine Ensrud; Edith M C Lau; Eric S Orwoll Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: F Cosman; D C Morgan; J W Nieves; V Shen; M M Luckey; D W Dempster; R Lindsay; M Parisien Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: E M Stein; M T Yin; D J McMahon; A Shu; C A Zhang; D C Ferris; I Colon; J F Dobkin; S M Hammer; E Shane Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: K E Barbour; J M Zmuda; M J Horwitz; E S Strotmeyer; R Boudreau; R W Evans; K E Ensrud; C L Gordon; M A Petit; A L Patrick; J A Cauley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: T O Jemielita; M B Leonard; J Baker; S Sayed; B S Zemel; J Shults; R Herskovitz; M R Denburg Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Saad Samargandy; Irfan Zeb; Temitope Foster; Ian H de Boer; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Eric Orwoll; Carrie M Nielson; Lynn M Marshall; Lori Lambert; Kathleen F Holton; Andrew R Hoffman; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; James M Shikany; Tien Dam; Jane A Cauley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 5.958