| Literature DB >> 17986320 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Detailed information on DNA-binding transcription factors (the key players in the regulation of gene expression) and on transcriptional regulatory interactions of microorganisms deduced from literature-derived knowledge, computer predictions and global DNA microarray hybridization experiments, has opened the way for the genome-wide analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks. The large-scale reconstruction of these networks allows the in silico analysis of cell behavior in response to changing environmental conditions. We previously published CoryneRegNet, an ontology-based data warehouse of corynebacterial transcription factors and regulatory networks. Initially, it was designed to provide methods for the analysis and visualization of the gene regulatory network of Corynebacterium glutamicum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17986320 PMCID: PMC2194740 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Figure 1System architecture of CoryneRegNet. This figure illustrates the system architecture of CoryneRegNet 4.0. It is a data warehouse: All time-consuming calculations are performed at data warehousing. The results are then transformed into an ontology-based data structure and imported to the MySQL database server (Back-End). An Apache web server processes the user requests, queries the database and constructs the corresponding web pages. It further provides the SOAP based Web Service servers for GenDB, EMMA, and other applications and also queries them as a client. A Java Applet is used for network visualization and analysis (Front-End).
Stimulons directly integrated in CoryneRegNet 4.0
| Organism | Short description | Nr. of genes | Publication |
| ΔDtxR (cg2103) vs. wildtype | 255 | [38] | |
| ΔLtbR (cg1486) vs. wildtype | 50 | [39] | |
| ΔMcbR (cg3253) vs. wildtype | 134 | [40] | |
| ΔSigM (cg3420) vs. wildtype | 37 | [41] | |
| ΔSsuR (cg0012) vs. wildtype | 29 | [42] | |
| grown on acetate/propionate vs. acetate | 160 | [43] | |
| res167 transition vs. res167 exponential | 111 | [44] | |
| wildtype vs. wildtype + vanillylalcohol | 93 | [45] |
This table briefly summarizes the stimulons that are integrated in CoryneRegNet.
Artificial corynebacterial stimulon
| Gene | GeneID | Operon | M-value | Regulated by |
| cg0444 | - | 1.9 | (R) | |
| cg0445 | -1.8 | (R) | ||
| cg0446 | 1.8 | (R) | ||
| cg0447 | -2.5 | (R) | ||
| - | cg0448 | -1.7 | (R) | |
| cg2831 | - | -1.6 | (R) |
This table shows a small, artificial stimulon, which can be applied to the novel consistency check feature of CoryneRegNet 4.0. Expression values are given as M-values. In the last column, we list that transcription factors, which control the gene in the first column. We denote (R) as repression and (A) as activation respectively. One can see 3 putative contradictions: (1) The gene sdhA is upregulated, while all the other genes in the same predicted operon are downregulated. (2) The gene ramB is upregulated, but the activator ramA is downregulated. (3) The gene sdhA is upregulated, while the activator ramA is downregulated and the repressor ramB is upregulated. Refer figure 3 for a visualization.
Figure 2An artificial stimulon. This screenshot shows the improved network analysis and visualization feature GraphVis. Presented is the artificial stimulon of table 2 projected onto the underlying gene regulatory network. The nodes represent genes and the edges gene regulations. Red nodes are repressors, green nodes activators, and blue nodes dual regulators. Gray nodes are target genes. A red edge represents a repression, a green edge an activation, and a blue edge a sigma factor regulation. The nodes sizes are relative to the expression value (M-value): the bigger the node, the more the differential expression of the respective gene. Genes can be upstimulated (green dotted node border) or downstimulated (red dotted border). The big multi-node groups genes to an operon. The circular node inside the operon is that gene, which is preceded by a transcription factor binding site.
Figure 3Result of the COMA feature applied to an artificial stimulon. This screenshot shows the result page of the COMA feature if applied to the artificial stimulon of table 2. There are 3 putative contradictions: 2 for sdhA (cg0446) and 1 for ramB (cg0444). For both genes, there are further transcriptional regulators listed that possibly could resolve the contradictions.
Database content development of CoryneRegNet
| Ver. | Org | Genes | TFs | Reg. genes | Regs | BM | PWM | Stim | Clust |
| 1.0 | 1 | 3058 | 53 | 331 | 430 | 192 | 23 | - | - |
| 2.0 | 4 | 10432 | 64 | 499 | 607 | 274 | 29 | - | - |
| 3.0 | 5 | 14737 | 213 | 1632 | 2912 | 1522 | 130 | - | - |
| 4.0 | 7 | 22920 | 213 | 1632 | 2912 | 1522 | 130 | 8 | 4548 |
This table summarizes the development and growth of CoryneRegNet from the first release 1.0 to the actual version 4.0. Legend: Ver = CoryneRegNet version, Org = organisms, Genes = genes, TFs = regulators, Reg. genes = regulated genes, Regs = regulations, BM = binding motifs, PWM = position weight matrices, Stim = stimulons, Clust = protein clusters.
Figure 4The ΔDtxR stimulon. This screenshot of the GraphVis feature of CoryneRegNet shows all the genes that are simulated by the ΔDtxR stimulon and all known corresponding transcriptional regulatory interactions. Also refer the legend of figure 3 for color codes.