Literature DB >> 17985961

Efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of intravenous midazolam and flunitrazepam for primary insomnia in terminally ill patients with cancer: a retrospective multicenter audit study.

Naoki Matsuo1, Tatsuya Morita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous midazolam and flunitrazepam are frequently administered for primary insomnia in Japan, there is no empirical study on their efficacy and safety. DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of midazolam and flunitrazepam, a multicenter retrospective audit study was performed on 104 and 59 patients receiving midazolam and flunitrazepam, respectively, from 18 certified palliative care units.
RESULTS: Median administration periods were 6 days and 9 days for midazolam and flunitrazepam, respectively. The median initial and maximum doses were 10 mg per night and 18 mg per night for midazolam, and 2 mg per night and 2 mg per night for flunitrazepam, respectively. There were no significant differences in the efficacy (91% in the midazolam group versus 81% in the flunitrazepam group, p = 0.084), hangover effect (34% versus 19%, p = 0.094), delirium at night (12% versus 10%, p = 1.0) and delirium next morning (11% versus 15%, p = 0.33), treatment withdrawal (4.8% versus 1.7%, p = 0.41), and treatment-related death (0% versus 0%, p = 1.0). Flunitrazepam caused respiratory depression defined as physician or nurses records such as apnea, respiratory arrest, decreased respiratory rate, and respiratory depression significantly more frequently than midazolam (17% versus 3.8%, p = 0.0073). The maximum dose was more highly correlated with the administration period in the midazolam group than in the flunitrazepam group (rho = 0.52, versus rho = 0.39), and, for patients treated for 14 days or longer, the daily escalation dose ratio required for maintaining adequate sleep was significantly higher in the midazolam group than in the flunitrazepam group (11% versus 2.6%, p = 0.015). The costs of the initial and maximum administration were significantly higher in the midazolam group than in the flunitrazepam group (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Intravenous midazolam and flunitrazepam appeared to be almost equal about efficacy and safety for primary insomnia, but flunitrazepam is less expensive and shows lower risk of tolerance development. A future prospective comparison study is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17985961     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  4 in total

1.  The use of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in improving sleep in patients who are undergoing treatment for cancer: a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (NCCTG Trial, N01C5).

Authors:  Debra L Barton; Pamela J Atherton; Brent A Bauer; Dennis F Moore; Bassam I Mattar; Beth I Lavasseur; Kendrith M Rowland; Robin T Zon; Nguyet A Lelindqwister; Gauri G Nagargoje; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Jeff A Sloan; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Does effective management of sleep disorders reduce cancer-related fatigue?

Authors:  Phyllis C Zee; Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Systematic review of sleep disorders in cancer patients: can the prevalence of sleep disorders be ascertained?

Authors:  Julie L Otte; Janet S Carpenter; Shalini Manchanda; Kevin L Rand; Todd C Skaar; Michael Weaver; Yelena Chernyak; Xin Zhong; Christele Igega; Carol Landis
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Current awareness: pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.890

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.