Literature DB >> 17985614

Point/Counterpoint. Peer reviews of medical physics practices often yield little information because the AAPM has not been proactive in developing appropriate peer-review guidelines.

Michael Gossman1, Per Halvorsen, Colin G Orton.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17985614     DOI: 10.1118/1.2775663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Sophie Foxcroft; Tom McGowan; Eric Gutierrez; Michael Sharpe; Padraig Warde
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.