Literature DB >> 17985378

An analysis of door-to-balloon time in a single center to determine causes of delay and possibilities for improvement.

Eugene B Wu1, Nipun Arora, Andrew C Eisenhauer, Frederic S Resnic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed door-to-balloon times in our institution to identify those factors which significantly prolong time to treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
BACKGROUND: Recent data have shown that patients with myocardial infarction transferred from one institution to another for PCI and those presenting outside of normal working hours suffer considerably prolonged door-to-balloon times.
METHODS: We analyzed the door-to-balloon time and its components from January 2005 to March 2006 in 167 consecutive patients presenting with STEMI to determine which variables were associated with delays.
RESULTS: The median door to balloon (DTB) time of all patients was 127 min. DTB was 62 min (P = 0.001) for patients presenting directly during working hours, 111.5 min for patients presenting directly during on-call hours, 157.5 min for patients presenting to outside hospitals during working hours and 149 min for patients transferred from outside hospitals during on-call hours. Factors that significantly lengthened DTB time included presentation during on-call hours (P = 0.007), outside hospital presentation (<0.001), prolonged time from chest pain onset to presentation (P = 0.004), absence of chest pain on presentation (P = 0.01), and cardiac arrest before PCI (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In our center, transport time and on-call hour delays account for the majority of reperfusion delay. Other factors that influenced delay were atypical presentation without chest pain, borderline ST changes, or delayed presentation. Thus, transfer from an outside facility, presentation after working hours, and having a difficult diagnosis all influence the rapidity of treatment. The implementation of an in-house STEMI response team may reduce the process induced delays and improve door-to-balloon times. Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17985378     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Door-to-balloon: where do we lose time? Single centre experience in India.

Authors:  Suma M Victor; Anand Gnanaraj; Vijayakumar S; Sushanth Pattabiram; Ajit S Mullasari
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-09-12

2.  Causes of delay in door-to-balloon time in south-east Asian patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Wen Jun Sim; An Shing Ang; Mae Chyi Tan; Wen Wei Xiang; David Foo; Kwok Kong Loh; Fahim Haider Jafary; Timothy James Watson; Paul Jau Lueng Ong; Hee Hwa Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Guideline-Based Critical Care Pathway Improves Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Jo-Jo Hai; Chun-Ka Wong; Ka-Chun Un; Ka-Lam Wong; Zhe-Yu Zhang; Pak-Hei Chan; Yui-Ming Lam; Wing-Sze Chan; Cheung-Chi Lam; Chor-Cheung Tam; Yiu-Tung Wong; See-Yue Yung; Ki-Wan Chan; Chung-Wah Siu; Chu-Pak Lau; Hung-Fat Tse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The impact of door-to-electrocardiogram time on door-to-balloon time after achieving the guideline-recommended target rate.

Authors:  Chih-Kuo Lee; Shih-Wei Meng; Ming-Hsien Lee; Hsiu-Chi Chen; Chia-Ling Wang; Hui-Ning Wang; Min-Tsun Liao; Mu-Yang Hsieh; Yung-Chung Huang; Edward Pei-Chuan Huang; Chih-Cheng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Efficacy of AutoPulse for Mechanical Chest Compression in Patients with Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation.

Authors:  Jarosław Gorący; Paweł Stachowiak; Arkadiusz Krejczy; Patrycja Piątek; Iwona Gorący
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.