RATIONALE: We have previously reported that selective antagonism of brain D3 receptors by SB-277011A or NGB 2904 significantly attenuates cocaine- or nicotine-enhanced brain stimulation reward (BSR). OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we investigated whether the selective D3 receptor antagonists SB-277011A and NGB 2904 and the putative partial D3 agonist BP-897 similarly reduce methamphetamine (METH)-enhanced BSR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were trained to respond for rewarding electrical self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. To assess the degree of drug-induced changes in BSR, a rate-frequency curve shift paradigm was used to measure brain-reward threshold (theta 0). RESULTS: METH (0.1-0.65 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently lowered ( approximately 10-50%) BSR thresholds, producing an enhancement of BSR. Pretreatment with SB-277011A (12 mg/kg, but not 24 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly attenuated METH-enhanced BSR. NGB 2904 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg, but not 10 mg/kg) also attenuated METH-enhanced BSR. SB-277011A or NGB 2904 alone, at the doses tested, had no effect on BSR. Pretreatment with BP-897 (0.1-5 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated METH-enhanced BSR. However, when the dose was increased to 10 mg/kg, BP-897 shifted the stimulation-response curve to the right (inhibited BSR itself) in the presence or absence of METH. CONCLUSIONS: Selective antagonism of D3 receptors by SB-277011A or NGB 2904 attenuates METH-enhanced BSR in rats, while the METH-enhanced BSR attenuation produced by BP-897 may involve both D3 and non-D3 receptors. These findings support a potential use of selective D3 receptor antagonists for the treatment of METH addiction.
RATIONALE: We have previously reported that selective antagonism of brain D3 receptors by SB-277011A or NGB 2904 significantly attenuates cocaine- or nicotine-enhanced brain stimulation reward (BSR). OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we investigated whether the selective D3 receptor antagonists SB-277011A and NGB 2904 and the putative partial D3 agonist BP-897 similarly reduce methamphetamine (METH)-enhanced BSR. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Rats were trained to respond for rewarding electrical self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. To assess the degree of drug-induced changes in BSR, a rate-frequency curve shift paradigm was used to measure brain-reward threshold (theta 0). RESULTS:METH (0.1-0.65 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently lowered ( approximately 10-50%) BSR thresholds, producing an enhancement of BSR. Pretreatment with SB-277011A (12 mg/kg, but not 24 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly attenuated METH-enhanced BSR. NGB 2904 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg, but not 10 mg/kg) also attenuated METH-enhanced BSR. SB-277011A or NGB 2904 alone, at the doses tested, had no effect on BSR. Pretreatment with BP-897 (0.1-5 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated METH-enhanced BSR. However, when the dose was increased to 10 mg/kg, BP-897 shifted the stimulation-response curve to the right (inhibited BSR itself) in the presence or absence of METH. CONCLUSIONS: Selective antagonism of D3 receptors by SB-277011A or NGB 2904 attenuates METH-enhanced BSR in rats, while the METH-enhanced BSR attenuation produced by BP-897 may involve both D3 and non-D3 receptors. These findings support a potential use of selective D3 receptor antagonists for the treatment of METH addiction.
Authors: Zheng-Xiong Xi; Amy Hauck Newman; Jeremy G Gilbert; Arlene C Pak; Xiao-Qing Peng; Charles R Ashby; Leah Gitajn; Eliot L Gardner Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: C Reavill; S G Taylor; M D Wood; T Ashmeade; N E Austin; K Y Avenell; I Boyfield; C L Branch; J Cilia; M C Coldwell; M S Hadley; A J Hunter; P Jeffrey; F Jewitt; C N Johnson; D N Jones; A D Medhurst; D N Middlemiss; D J Nash; G J Riley; C Routledge; G Stemp; K M Thewlis; B Trail; A K Vong; J J Hagan Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: P Sokoloff; J Diaz; B Le Foll; O Guillin; L Leriche; E Bezard; C Gross Journal: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Ellen Y T Chien; Wei Liu; Qiang Zhao; Vsevolod Katritch; Gye Won Han; Michael A Hanson; Lei Shi; Amy Hauck Newman; Jonathan A Javitch; Vadim Cherezov; Raymond C Stevens Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 47.728