Literature DB >> 17985107

Interests and neonates: there is more to the story than we explicitly acknowledge.

D Micah Hester1.   

Abstract

Although there are many different moral arguments concerning the use of Best Interests in neonatal decision-making, there seems in practice a firm commitment to application of the concept. And yet, there is still little reflection given by practitioners about what employing a Best Interest determination means in infant care. The following lays out a comprehensive taxonomy of interest-sources in order to provide for more robust considerations of what constitutes best interests of/for neonates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17985107     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-007-9048-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard.

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2005-08

2.  The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness.

Authors:  L M Kopelman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1997-06

3.  Health care decisionmaking by children. Is it in their best interest?

Authors:  L F Ross
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 4.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004
  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  International variations in application of the best-interest standard across the age spectrum.

Authors:  N Laventhal; A A E Verhagen; T W R Hansen; E Dempsey; P G Davis; G A Musante; A Wiles; W Meadow; A Janvier
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard.

Authors:  Erica K Salter
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-06

3.  Living with a crucial decision: a qualitative study of parental narratives three years after the loss of their newborn in the NICU.

Authors:  Laurence Caeymaex; Mario Speranza; Caroline Vasilescu; Claude Danan; Marie-Michèle Bourrat; Micheline Garel; Catherine Jousselme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.903

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.