Literature DB >> 17983693

Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty.

Philippe Favre1, Beat Moor, Jess G Snedeker, Christian Gerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical experience suggests that component impingement can lead to eccentric implant loading and thereby cause glenoid loosening in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. This study tests the hypothesis that certain implant component positioning configurations may lead to impingement within the physiological range of motion.
METHODS: A rigid-body model of the shoulder comprising the scapula and humerus was constructed. Within this 3D model, a commercially available total shoulder arthroplasty implant was positioned according to manufacturer guidelines. The configuration was modified around this default position to investigate the associated angle of inferior and superior impingement during glenohumeral elevation, as well as in lateral impingement during axial rotation at both 0 degrees and 60 degrees of glenohumeral elevation. Glenoid component size, version, inclination and inferior-superior offset as well as humeral component size, torsion, inclination, offset and height were examined. The influence of the humeral calcar anatomy was also investigated.
FINDINGS: Certain implant configurations caused component impingement in the physiological range of motion. The most sensitive parameters affecting impingement were: (1) the inclination of the glenoid component, (2) the inferior-superior position of the humeral component along the resection line and (3) the prominence of the humeral calcar. Glenoid offset and inclination and humeral head offset and height directly affected subacromial impingement.
INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that several intraoperatively adjustable implant positioning parameters can influence the likelihood of implant impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty, and that the geometry of the humeral calcar should be taken into consideration when designing an operative strategy for shoulder joint replacement.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17983693     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  17 in total

1.  Variability of medial and posterior offset in patients with fourth-generation stemmed shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Alexander Berth; Georges Blatter; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Prospective study of double-eccentric hemi shoulder arthroplasty in different aetiologies: midterm results.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Georges Blatter; Katja Gebhardt; Geza Pap; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Steffen End; Mustafa Kilic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Geometrical analysis of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a radiological study of seventy TESS total shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Hamid Hassany; Mats Wadsten; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Humeral head sizing using extra-articular landmarks on conventional radiographs.

Authors:  David D Savin; Hristo Piponov; Jeffrey Goldstein; Ari R Youderian
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Position of shoulder arthroplasty and clinical outcome in proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Roberto Padua; L Padua; M Galluzzo; E Ceccarelli; F Alviti; A Castagna
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-07

7.  A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas J Maister; Andrew Hely; Liam G Twycross; Stephen D Gill; Richard S Page
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2020-05-21

8.  Severe impingement of lumbar disc replacements increases the functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris.

Authors:  Ryan M Baxter; Daniel W Macdonald; Steven M Kurtz; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Burns; Tym Frank; Cari M Whyne; Patrick Dg Henry
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-10-26

10.  In Silico Clinical Trials in the Orthopedic Device Industry: From Fantasy to Reality?

Authors:  Philippe Favre; Ghislain Maquer; Adam Henderson; Daniel Hertig; Daniel Ciric; Jeffrey E Bischoff
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.