Literature DB >> 17983660

Incidence of postoperative infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis with original and generic cefuroxime.

Ekaterini Mastoraki1, Argyris Michalopoulos, Ioannis Kriaras, Ero Mouchtouri, Matthew E Falagas, Matthew Falagas, Dimitra Karatza, Stefanos Geroulanos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of post-operative infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery who received generic cefuroxime (gCFX) instead of original cefuroxime (oCFX) as antimicrobial prophylaxis.
METHODS: The study had two parts, a prospective and a retrospective one (4 weeks with oCFX followed by 4 weeks with gCFX in each part; total study duration of 16 weeks). The studied patient population was 618 consecutive adult patients who underwent on pump CABG surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to type of formulation they received: 313 patients received oCFX and 305 gCFX.
RESULTS: Eight (2.5%) and 39 (12.8%) patients in the oCFX and gCFX group, respectively, developed postoperative infections (p<0.001). There were 6 (1.9%) surgical site infections in the oCFX group and 31 (10.1%) in the gCFX group (p<0.001). Bacteremia occurred in 2 (0.6%) patients in the oCFX group and in 8 (2.6%) patients in the gCFX group (p=0.1). In addition, septic shock occurred in 6 cases (2.0%, p=0.04) and multiple organ failure in another 4 patients (1.3%, p=0.1) in the gCFX group. The most common pathogens isolated were Gram-positive cocci in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a higher incidence of postoperative infections in adult patients undergoing CABG surgery receiving gCFX compared to oCFX as antimicrobial prophylaxis. The findings of our study provide additional evidence regarding the problem of substandard drugs, in our case a formulation of a generic antibiotic, even in developed countries. ULTRAMINI-
SUMMARY: The incidence of post-operative infections following CABG surgery was higher in adult patients receiving generic instead of original cefuroxime as antimicrobial prophylaxis. The findings of our study provide additional evidence regarding the problem of substandard drugs, in our case a formulation of a generic antibiotic, even in developed countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17983660     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect        ISSN: 0163-4453            Impact factor:   6.072


  14 in total

1.  Determination of therapeutic equivalence of generic products of gentamicin in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model.

Authors:  Andres F Zuluaga; Maria Agudelo; John J Cardeño; Carlos A Rodriguez; Omar Vesga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of the anti-staphylococcal efficacy of generic products and the innovator of oxacillin.

Authors:  Carlos A Rodriguez; Maria Agudelo; Andres F Zuluaga; Omar Vesga
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Quality and stability of ramipril generics/copies versus reference ramipril (Tritace): a 3-month stability comparative study.

Authors:  Depalmo Galli Angeli; Carlo Trezza
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Therapeutic equivalence requires pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic identities: true bioequivalence of a generic product of intravenous metronidazole.

Authors:  M Agudelo; O Vesga
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Even apparently insignificant chemical deviations among bioequivalent generic antibiotics can lead to therapeutic nonequivalence: the case of meropenem.

Authors:  M Agudelo; C A Rodriguez; C A Pelaez; O Vesga
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Quality of reporting of bioequivalence trials comparing generic to brand name drugs: a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Amélie van der Meersch; Agnès Dechartres; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of branded and generic formulations of meloxicam in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Mario Del Tacca; Giuseppe Pasqualetti; Giovanni Gori; Pasquale Pepe; Antonello Di Paolo; Marianna Lastella; Ferdinando De Negri; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Comparative plasma exposure and lung distribution of two human use commercial azithromycin formulations assessed in murine model: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Virginia Rivulgo; Mónica Sparo; Mónica Ceci; Elida Fumuso; Alejandra Confalonieri; Gastón Delpech; Sergio F Sánchez Bruni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Pharmacodynamics of nine generic products of amikacin compared with the innovator in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model.

Authors:  Andres F Zuluaga; Carlos A Rodriguez; Maria Agudelo; Omar Vesga
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-10-07

Review 10.  Substandard drugs: a potential crisis for public health.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; David W Holt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.