Literature DB >> 17983544

[Cost-effectiveness and degree of satisfaction with home sleep monitoring in patients with symptoms of sleep apnea].

Bernabé Jurado Gámez1, Javier Redel Montero, Luis Muñoz Cabrera, Mari Carmen Fernández Marín, Elisa Muñoz Gomáriz, Miguel Angel Martín Pérez, Andrés Cosano Povedano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic validity, degree of patient satisfaction, and economic cost of home sleep monitoring compared to conventional polysomnography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptoms indicative of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) were included. We analyzed the diagnostic yield of home sleep monitoring using the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), number of desaturations of at least 3%, and the percentage time with arterial oxygen saturation below 90%. The degree of patient satisfaction, measured on a visual analogue scale, and the cost of home monitoring were compared with conventional polysomnography.
RESULTS: The study included 52 patients (42 men and 10 women) with a mean (SD) age of 51.8 (9) years and a body mass index of 32 (5) kg/m2. Polysomnography and home monitoring revealed an AHI of 33.6 (20) and 31 (19), respectively (r=0.971; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.963; P< .001). The number of desaturations of at least 3% and the percentage time with arterial oxygen saturation below 90% showed significant correlation and concordance (P< .05). For an AHI cutoff of 10 recorded with polysomnography, home monitoring had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 80%, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.804. For severe SAHS (AHI> or =30), the sensitivity and specificity of home monitoring was 100% (that is, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 1). For home monitoring, the cost per diagnostic test was 101.34 euro less than that of polysomnography, and the patient satisfaction was significantly greater (P< .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Home sleep monitoring is a valid and cost-effective diagnostic test; patients with symptoms of SAHS are more satisfied with this technique than conventional polysomnography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17983544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol        ISSN: 0300-2896            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  Obstructive sleep apnea devices for out-of-center (OOC) testing: technology evaluation.

Authors:  Nancy A Collop; Sharon L Tracy; Vishesh Kapur; Reena Mehra; David Kuhlmann; Sam A Fleishman; Joseph M Ojile
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 2.  Occupational health of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ottavia Guglielmi; Bernabé Jurado-Gámez; Francisco Gude; Gualberto Buela-Casal
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Utility of home sleep apnea testing devices in patients with cardiac conditions-critical manual interpretation of the raw data is important.

Authors:  Mukesh Kapoor
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Usefulness of Home Overnight Pulse Oximetry in Patients with Suspected Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

Authors:  Cristina Esteban-Amarilla; Silvia Martin-Bote; Antonio Jurado-Garcia; Ana Palomares-Muriana; Nuria Feu-Collado; Bernabe Jurado-Gamez
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Effect of a Graduated Walking Program on the Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Antonio Jurado-García; Guillermo Molina-Recio; Nuria Feu-Collado; Ana Palomares-Muriana; Adela María Gómez-González; Francisca Lourdes Márquez-Pérez; Bernabé Jurado-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.