Literature DB >> 1798307

Physiological responses of typical versus heavy weight triathletes to treadmill and bicycle exercise.

R W Deitrick1.   

Abstract

A physiological comparison of the responses of typical weight (less than 90 kg) versus heavy weight (greater than 90 kg) male triathletes to maximal treadmill and maximal bicycle exercise was performed to better understand the effects of weight on endurance performance. The heavy triathlete group (90.9 +/- 3.2 kg, mean +/- SD) had significantly (p less than .01) greater percent body fat (11.9 +/- 3.6 vs 7.4 +/- 1.8%) while having significantly (p +/- .01) lower VO2max values expressed in ml.kg-1.min-1 on both the treadmill (55.6 +/- 4.1 vs 69.9 +/- 5.5) and bicycle ergometer (51.9 +/- 3.9 vs 60.5 +/- 6.2) than the typical triathlete group (66.6 +/- 5.9 kg). Analysis of covariance using body fat as the covariate resulted in persistent significant (p less than .02) VO2max (ml.kg-1.min-1) differences between the groups. Statistically significant (p less than .05) differences in running economy existed between the groups (33.7 +/- 2.7 vs 37.1 +/- 1.5 ml.kg-1.min-1; typical vs heavy). The heavy triathletes also had a significantly (p less than .01) shorter treadmill performance time (9.6 +/- 2.3 vs 13.2 +/- 1.7 min) and significantly (p less than .01) lower power per weight ratio on the bicycle ergometer (5.37 +/- 0.48 vs 6.47 +/- 0.59 watts/kg). These findings indicate that the heavy triathlete is at a physiological disadvantage when competing in endurance events and supports the inclusion of a weight category in these events. The reported triathlon results support these physiological findings.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1798307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  6 in total

Review 1.  Physiological demands of running during long distance runs and triathlons.

Authors:  C Hausswirth; D Lehénaff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Physical and physiological factors associated with success in the triathlon.

Authors:  G G Sleivert; D S Rowlands
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Applied physiology of triathlon.

Authors:  M L O'Toole; P S Douglas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities.

Authors:  Filipe A B Sousa; Fúlvia B Manchado-Gobatto; Natália de A Rodrigues; Gustavo G de Araujo; Claudio A Gobatto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes.

Authors:  Gregoire P Millet; V E Vleck; D J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  BMI, a performance parameter for speed improvement.

Authors:  Adrien Sedeaud; Andy Marc; Adrien Marck; Frédéric Dor; Julien Schipman; Maya Dorsey; Amal Haida; Geoffroy Berthelot; Jean-François Toussaint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.