RATIONALE: Alcohol affects a variety of human behaviors, including visual perception and motor control. Although recent research has begun to explore mechanisms that mediate these changes, their exact nature is still not well understood. OBJECTIVES: The present study used two basic oculomotor tasks to examine the effect of alcohol on different levels of visual processing within the same individuals. A theoretical framework is offered to integrate findings across multiple levels of oculomotor control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four healthy participants were asked to perform eye movements in reflexive (pro-) and voluntary (anti-) saccade tasks. In one of two counterbalanced sessions, performance was measured after alcohol administration (mean BrAC=69 mg%); the other served as a within-subjects no-alcohol comparison condition. RESULTS: Error rates were not influenced by alcohol intoxication in either task. However, there were significant effects of alcohol on saccade latency and peak velocity in both tasks. Critically, a specific alcohol-induced impairment (hypermetria) in saccade amplitudes was observed exclusively in the anti-saccade task. CONCLUSIONS: The saccade latency data strongly suggest that alcohol intoxication impairs temporal aspects of saccade generation, irrespective of the level of processing triggering the saccade. The absence of effects on anti-saccade errors calls for further research into the notion of alcohol-induced impairment of the ability to inhibit prepotent responses. Furthermore, the specific impairment of saccade amplitude in the anti-saccade task under alcohol suggests that higher level processes involved in the spatial remapping of target location in the absence of a visually specified saccade goal are specifically affected by alcohol intoxication.
RATIONALE: Alcohol affects a variety of human behaviors, including visual perception and motor control. Although recent research has begun to explore mechanisms that mediate these changes, their exact nature is still not well understood. OBJECTIVES: The present study used two basic oculomotor tasks to examine the effect of alcohol on different levels of visual processing within the same individuals. A theoretical framework is offered to integrate findings across multiple levels of oculomotor control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four healthy participants were asked to perform eye movements in reflexive (pro-) and voluntary (anti-) saccade tasks. In one of two counterbalanced sessions, performance was measured after alcohol administration (mean BrAC=69 mg%); the other served as a within-subjects no-alcohol comparison condition. RESULTS: Error rates were not influenced by alcohol intoxication in either task. However, there were significant effects of alcohol on saccade latency and peak velocity in both tasks. Critically, a specific alcohol-induced impairment (hypermetria) in saccade amplitudes was observed exclusively in the anti-saccade task. CONCLUSIONS: The saccade latency data strongly suggest that alcohol intoxication impairs temporal aspects of saccade generation, irrespective of the level of processing triggering the saccade. The absence of effects on anti-saccade errors calls for further research into the notion of alcohol-induced impairment of the ability to inhibit prepotent responses. Furthermore, the specific impairment of saccade amplitude in the anti-saccade task under alcohol suggests that higher level processes involved in the spatial remapping of target location in the absence of a visually specified saccade goal are specifically affected by alcohol intoxication.
Authors: T Blekher; J D Beard; S O'Connor; W E Orr; V A Ramchandani; K Miller; R D Yee; T-K Li Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Ksenija Marinkovic; Elizabeth Rickenbacher; Sheeva Azma; Elinor Artsy; Adrian K C Lee Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Tobias M Merz; Martina M Bosch; Daniel Barthelmes; Jacqueline Pichler; Urs Hefti; Kai-Uwe Schmitt; Konrad E Bloch; Otto D Schoch; Thomas Hess; Alexander J Turk; Urs Schwarz Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Bruce D Bartholow; Kimberly A Fleming; Phillip K Wood; Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Lee Altamirano; Akira Miyake; Jorge Martins; Kenneth J Sher Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Terence L Tyson; Nathan H Feick; Patrick F Cravalho; Erin E Flynn-Evans; Leland S Stone Journal: J Physiol Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 5.182