Literature DB >> 17982553

Tooth structure and fracture strength of cavities.

José Mondelli1, Fábio Sene, Renata Pereira Ramos, Ana Raquel Benetti.   

Abstract

This study evaluated, in vitro, the loss of tooth substance after cavity preparation for direct and indirect restorations and its relationship with fracture strength of the prepared teeth. Sixty sound human maxillary first premolars were assigned to 6 groups (n=10). MOD direct composite cavities (Groups I, II and III) and indirect inlay cavities (Groups IV, V and VI) were prepared maintaining standardized dimensions: 2-mm deep pulpal floors, 1.5-mm wide gingival walls and 2-mm high axial walls. Buccolingual width of the occlusal box was established at 1/4 (Groups I and IV), 1/3 (Groups II and V) or 1/2 (Groups III and VI) of the intercuspal distance. Teeth were weighed (digital balance accurate to 0.001 g) before and after preparation to record tooth substance mass lost during cavity preparation. The prepared teeth were submitted to occlusal loading to determine their fracture strength using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha= 0.05). 1/4-inlay cavities had higher percent mean mass loss (9.71%) than composite resin cavities with the same width (7.07%). 1/3-inlay preparations also produced higher percent mean mass loss (13.91%) than composite resin preparations with the same width (10.02%). 1/2-inlay cavities had 21.34% of mass loss versus 16.19% for the 1/2-composite resin cavities. Fracture strength means (in kgf) were: GI = 187.65; GII = 143.62; GIII = 74.10; GIV = 164.22; GV = 101.92; GVI = 50.35. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) were observed between Groups I and IV, II and V, III and VI. Higher tooth structure loss and lower fracture strength were recorded after preparation of inlay cavities, regardless of the width of the occlusal box, compared to the direct composite resin cavities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17982553     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000200009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  9 in total

1.  Interfacial degradation of adhesive composite restorations mediated by oral biofilms and mechanical challenge in an extracted tooth model of secondary caries.

Authors:  Carola A Carrera; Yuping Li; Ruoquiong Chen; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok; Joel Rudney
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Influence of the restorative procedure factors on stress values in premolar with MOD cavity: a finite element study.

Authors:  Ivana Kantardžić; Darko Vasiljević; Ognjan Lužanin; Tatjana Maravić; Larisa Blažić
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ivana Kantardzić; Darko Vasiljević; Larisa Blazić; Ognjan Luzanin
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  Fracture resistance of premolars restored by various types and placement techniques of resin composites.

Authors:  Horieh Moosavi; Mahsa Zeynali; Zahra Hosseini Pour
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-05-14

5.  Effect of composite/amalgam thickness on fracture resistance of maxillary premolar teeth, restored with combined amalgam-composite restorations.

Authors:  Maryam Firouzmandi; Maryam Doozandeh; Zahra Jowkar; Sanaz Abbasi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  An in vitro comparison of the fracture resistance of standard and modified mesio-occluso-distal cavity designs restored with resin composite restoration.

Authors:  Ahmad M Al-Thobity; Abdulmalik Altaher; Abdullah Alharbi; Mutasim Elnour
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

7.  Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Mohit K Gunwal; Pratima R Shenoi; Tanvee Paranjape; Sonal Dhote; Ravish Tongya; Magesh Kumar; Sanjay Rastogi
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of Conservative and Extended MOD Cavities Restored with Cention N.

Authors:  Maryam Firouzmandi; Ali Asghar Alavi; Dana Jafarpour; Soroush Sadatsharifee
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 9.  Influence of Methodological Variables on Fracture Strength Tests Results of Premolars with Different Number of Residual Walls. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Carlo Gaeta; Crystal Marruganti; Emanuele Mignosa; Giovanni Franciosi; Edoardo Ferrari; Simone Grandini
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.