Literature DB >> 17982218

The impact of pay-for-performance on diabetes care in a large network of community health centers.

Katie Coleman1, Kristin L Reiter, Dan Fulwiler.   

Abstract

Pay-for-performance programs are being developed to improve quality of care despite limited empirical evidence demonstrating their effectiveness, especially in underserved communities. Using data on 1,166 patients treated by 46 primary care physicians, this paper examines the effect of an innovative pay-for-performance program implemented in 2004 at the nation's largest federally qualified health center on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing and HbA1c scores. Univariate analysis and logistic regression results show that the pay-for-performance program significantly increased the likelihood that patients received two HbA1c tests per year as recommended by the American Diabetes Association. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression results reveal that physicians' baseline performance was positively related to performance after program implementation. Finally, OLS regression results suggest that the program did not contribute to improved blood sugar control. The pay-for-performance program appeared to improve compliance with HbA1c testing recommendations, but a more comprehensive strategy, including increased patient support, may be necessary to improve health outcomes in disadvantaged populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17982218     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2007.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  14 in total

1.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

2.  Outcomes of a Seven Practice Pilot in a Pay-For-Performance (P4P)-Based Program in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Rhonda M Johnson; Twyla Johnson; Sarah D Zimmerman; Gary M Marsh; Oralia Garcia-Dominic
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-03

3.  Reforming medicare's dialysis payment policies: implications for patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Charu Gupta; Glenn M Chertow; Mark T Linthicum; Karen Van Nuys; Vasily Belozeroff; Darryl Quarles; Darius N Lakdawalla
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Case-mix adjustment and the comparison of community health center performance on patient experience measures.

Authors:  M Laura Johnson; Hector P Rodriguez; M Rosa Solorio
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Association between physician quality improvement incentives and ambulatory quality measures.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 6.  Designing an effective pay-for-performance system in the Korean National Health Insurance.

Authors:  Hyoung-Sun Jeong
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31

7.  Provider and patient directed financial incentives to improve care and outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Ilona S Lorincz; Brittany C T Lawson; Judith A Long
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Physician financial incentives and care for the underserved in the United States.

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Marshall H Chin; G Caleb Alexander; Hui Tang; Monica E Peek
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.