Literature DB >> 17981834

The association between biocide tolerance and the presence or absence of qac genes among hospital-acquired and community-acquired MRSA isolates.

Karen Smith1, Curtis G Gemmell, Iain S Hunter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The MBCs of three commonly used hospital biocides [containing quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), chlorhexidine gluconate and triclosan] were determined for clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, which were also screened for genes encoding Qac efflux pumps.
METHODS: MBCs were determined by broth microdilution for 94 clinical isolates of S. aureus, including 38 hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (HA-MRSA), 25 community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA), 25 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 6 with intermediate resistance to vancomycin (VISA). All isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of qacA, B, C, G, H and J.
RESULTS: Biocides had MBCs 10-1000-fold lower than the concentration recommended for use by the manufacturer. HA-MRSA isolates developed significantly enhanced tolerance to QACs following repeat exposure to subinhibitory concentrations. Ten HA-MRSA and four VISA isolates carried qacA. Two HA-MRSA isolates, one MSSA isolate and one VISA isolate carried qacC. One VISA isolate carried qacA and qacC. The CA-MRSA isolates did not carry qac genes. qacG, H and J were not detected in any HA-MRSA. Isolates with qac genes had significantly (P < 0.0001) higher MBCs for biocides containing QACs and chlorhexidine gluconate. These biocides induced expression of qac genes when assayed with a luciferase reporter.
CONCLUSIONS: Biocides commonly used in the hospital environment should be effective against clinical isolates of S. aureus if used at concentrations recommended by the manufacturer. However, isolates have the potential to develop increased tolerance to these agents and the expression of Qac efflux pumps results in isolates with a selective advantage when challenged with biocides containing QACs and chlorhexidine gluconate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17981834     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  41 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Resistance to Agents Used for Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization: Is There a Reason for Concern?

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Distribution of antiseptic resistance genes qacA, qacB, and smr in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Toronto, Canada, from 2005 to 2009.

Authors:  Jean Longtin; Christine Seah; Krystal Siebert; Allison McGeer; Andrew Simor; Yves Longtin; Donald E Low; Roberto G Melano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Long-term persistence of a multi-resistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MR-MSSA) clone at a university hospital in southeast Sweden, without further transmission within the region.

Authors:  M Lindqvist; B Isaksson; J Swanberg; R Skov; A R Larsen; J Larsen; A Petersen; A Hällgren
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Hand sanitizers: Science and rationale.

Authors:  Satarupa Kumar; Anupam Das
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Mechanisms of Bacterial Tolerance and Persistence in the Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Environments.

Authors:  R Trastoy; T Manso; L Fernández-García; L Blasco; A Ambroa; M L Pérez Del Molino; G Bou; R García-Contreras; T K Wood; M Tomás
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Frequency of Antiseptic Resistance Among Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated From a University Hospital in Central Iran.

Authors:  Nona Taheri; Abdollah Ardebili; Alireza Amouzandeh-Nobaveh; Ehsanollah Ghaznavi-Rad
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-11

8.  Prevalence of antiseptic resistance genes increases in staphylococcal isolates from orthokeratology lens wearers over initial six-month period of use.

Authors:  Shi Guang-Sen; Maureen Boost; Pauline Cho
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infection.

Authors:  Michael W Climo; Deborah S Yokoe; David K Warren; Trish M Perl; Maureen Bolon; Loreen A Herwaldt; Robert A Weinstein; Kent A Sepkowitz; John A Jernigan; Kakotan Sanogo; Edward S Wong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The fusidic acid stimulon of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Alejandro Delgado; Shahrear Zaman; Arunachalam Muthaiyan; Vijayaraj Nagarajan; Mohamed O Elasri; Brian J Wilkinson; John E Gustafson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.