Literature DB >> 17981055

Auditory processing of different types of pseudo-words: an event-related fMRI study.

Tim Raettig1, Sonja A Kotz.   

Abstract

Imaging results on real word and pseudo-word processing have been heterogeneous, allowing only cautious claims about the neuroanatomical loci of lexico-semantic processing. In order to shed more light on this issue, we examined the impact of different structures of non-lexical stimuli on the outcome of comparisons between such items and matched real words. We anticipated that the degree to which a pseudo-word still resembles a particular real word template determines how word-like it is processed. To verify this idea, we tested different types of pseudo-words (either phonotactically legal and transparently or opaquely derived from real words or phonotactically illegal) in an event-related fMRI paradigm utilizing a lexical decision task. All types of pseudo-words elicited a stronger hemodynamic brain response than real words in the bilateral superior temporal gyri. Real words produced stronger brain activations than pseudo-words in the left posterior middle temporal and angular gyri, the rostral and caudal cingulate gyrus, the precuneus and the right inferior temporal gyrus. When contrasted to opaque pseudo-words transparent pseudo-words elicited a stronger brain response in a temporo-parietal region adjacent to the one observed for real words. Our results provide further support for the involvement of the left posterior middle temporal and angular gyri in lexical-semantic processing. The data also indicate that transparently derived pseudo-words are processed similarly to real words. In contrast, semantic operations are blocked when opaquely derived pseudo-words are processed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17981055     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  32 in total

1.  Neural correlates of semantic associations in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharina Sass; Stefan Heim; Olga Sachs; Benjamin Straube; Frank Schneider; Ute Habel; Tilo Kircher
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Phonological Working Memory for Words and Nonwords in Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Satrajit S Ghosh; Irina Ostrovskaya; John D E Gabrieli; Ioulia Kovelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural correlates of sublexical processing in phonological working memory.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Jane E Warren; Frank Eisner; Chloe R Marshall; Pradheep Shanmugalingam; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Neural processing during older adults' comprehension of spoken sentences: age differences in resource allocation and connectivity.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Vanessa Troiani; Arthur Wingfield; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Subcortical roles in lexical task processing: Inferences from thalamic and subthalamic event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannes O Tiedt; Felicitas Ehlen; Lea K Krugel; Andreas Horn; Andrea A Kühn; Fabian Klostermann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Simultaneously recorded subthalamic and cortical LFPs reveal different lexicality effects during reading aloud.

Authors:  A Chrabaszcz; D Wang; W J Lipski; A Bush; D J Crammond; S Shaiman; M W Dickey; L L Holt; R S Turner; J A Fiez; R M Richardson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  Altered Resting-State Signals in Patients with Acute Stroke In or Under the Thalamus.

Authors:  Lijun Chen; Chuanfu Li; Jian Zhai; Anqin Wang; Qin Song; Ying Liu; Ru Ma; Long Han; Yamikani Ndasauka; Xiaoming Li; Hai Li; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates.

Authors:  David W Gow; Jennifer A Segawa; Seppo P Ahlfors; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; M Gareth Gaskell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.