Literature DB >> 1798040

The effect of naloxone on spinal reflexes to electrical and mechanical stimuli in the anaesthetized, spinalized rat.

N A Hartell1, P M Headley.   

Abstract

1. Previous studies of the effects of naloxone on spinal neural responses have yielded disparate results. The reasons for this remain unclear but may relate to the diversity of animal preparations used, the route of administration of naloxone, the site and modality of the stimuli and the intensity of afferent input used. 2. A model requiring little preparative surgery compared to most other electrophysiological preparations has now been used to investigate the effects of naloxone (1, 10, 20 and 50 micrograms kg-1 I.V.) on single-motor-unit flexion reflex responses to alternating mechanical and electrical stimuli in spinalized rats, anaesthetized with alpha-chloralose. 3. Naloxone caused a dose-dependent facilitation of reflex responses to electrical stimuli delivered at intensities sufficient to activate either A fibres alone or A and C fibre afferents together. The component of the responses presumed to be due primarily to activation of C fibres was enhanced relatively more than the A fibre component. 4. Responses evoked during high-intensity mechanical pinch stimuli were not facilitated by equivalent doses of naloxone. The post-stimulus after-discharge was, however, enhanced by a similar percentage to the response to high-intensity electrical stimuli. 5. Lowering the intensity of the mechanical stimulus led to a diminished firing rate of the units during the stimulus itself. The stimulus was, nevertheless, still noxious. Naloxone was found to have a facilitatory effect on this smaller evoked response both during the pinch stimulus and during the period of after-discharge. The apparent lack of effect of naloxone during the higher intensity mechanical stimulus may be due to neurones in the polysynaptic pathway being activated at near-maximal firing rates. 6. We conclude that the ability of naloxone to facilitate spinal reflexes is not dependent on the nature of the stimulus, at least between electrical and mechanical stimuli, but is more a function of the intensity of the applied stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1798040      PMCID: PMC1179902          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  29 in total

1.  Spinal effects of four injectable anaesthetics on nociceptive reflexes in rats: a comparison of electrophysiological and behavioural measurements.

Authors:  N A Hartell; P M Headley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Spinal antinociceptive actions and naloxone reversibility of intravenous mu- and kappa-opioids in spinalized rats: potency mismatch with values reported for spinal administration.

Authors:  C G Parsons; D C West; P M Headley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Opioid peptide immunoreactivity in spinal and trigeminal dorsal horn neurons projecting to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat.

Authors:  D G Standaert; S J Watson; R A Houghten; C B Saper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Paradoxical effects of low doses of naloxone in experimental models of inflammatory pain.

Authors:  V Kayser; J M Besson; G Guilbaud
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  The contributions of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors to the actions of endogenous opioids on spinal reflexes in the rabbit.

Authors:  R W Clarke; T W Ford
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Physiological properties of unmyelinated fiber projection to the spinal cord.

Authors:  L M Mendell
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Spinal antinociceptive actions of mu- and kappa-opioids: the importance of stimulus intensity in determining 'selectivity' between reflexes to different modalities of noxious stimulus.

Authors:  C G Parsons; P M Headley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Behavioural and electrophysiological studies on the paradoxical antinociceptive effects of an extremely low dose of naloxone in an animal model of acute and localized inflammation.

Authors:  V Kayser; J M Benoist; A Neil; M Gautron; G Guilbaud
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A model of chronic pain in the rat: response of multiple opioid systems to adjuvant-induced arthritis.

Authors:  M J Millan; M H Millan; A Członkowski; V Höllt; C W Pilcher; A Herz; F C Colpaert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Morphine-sensitive and morphine-insensitive actions of C-fibre input on the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  C J Woolf; P D Wall
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mu-opioidergic modulation differs in deep and superficial wide-dynamic range dorsal horn neurons in mice.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Wei-Yan Li; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Reversal by naloxone of the spinal antinociceptive actions of a systemically-administered NSAID.

Authors:  J F Herrero; P M Headley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.739

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.