Literature DB >> 17980333

Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists.

Michelle Englund1, Stephen Robson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Australian gynecologists would like to increase the proportion of hysterectomies they perform laparoscopically and the factors that might limit their acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH).
DESIGN: Anonymous postal survey (Canadian Task Force classification III).
SETTING: Department of obstetrics and gynecology of a major Australian medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred ninety-six certified obstetrician/gynecologists in practice in Australia. MAIN
RESULTS: Of 796 respondents, 654 (82%) reported that hysterectomy was part of their normal clinical practice. Of those, 206 (31%) did not perform LH. Respondents who reported performing the highest proportion of LH were those in urban, private hospital settings. Of those who performed hysterectomy, 62% (403/654) reported they did not wish to increase the proportion of LH they undertook. However, of those, 49% (197/403) already performed LH, with 20% (39/197) of that group performing 80% or more of all hysterectomies as LH. Overall, 38% (251/654) of respondents indicated a desire to perform an increased proportion of LH. The commonest factors cited as limited acceptance of LH were insufficient experience and training, lack of hospital equipment, and lack of support from colleagues.
CONCLUSION: Many Australian gynecologists report a desire to increase their rate of LH, but those intentions are compromised by problems with training, equipment, and support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980333     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

1.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Kristen A Matteson; Jay Schulkin; Niraj R Chavan; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Which one is safer - performing a laparoscopic hysterectomy with a tissue fusion device involving diagnostic cystoscopy or traditional abdominal hysterectomy with ureteral dissection?

Authors:  Ali Yavuzcan; Gazi Yildiz; Mete Cağlar; Raşit Altıntaş; Serdar Dilbaz; Pinar Yildiz; Selahattin Kumru; Yusuf Ustün
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  A multimodal concept for vaginal cuff closure by modification of the Bakay technique in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Üzeyir Kalkan; Kadir Bakay
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Laparoscopic total hysterectomy still not routinely chosen Operative description and available instruments.

Authors:  Alexandra Popa; Catalin Copaescu; Valerica Horhoianu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.