Literature DB >> 17980271

Transcervical carotid stenting with carotid artery flow reversal: 3-year follow-up of 103 stents.

Enrique Criado1, Juan Fontcuberta, Antonio Orgaz, Angel Flores, Manuel Doblas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the perioperative and 3-year follow-up results of 103 consecutive carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures done with a transcervical approach using carotid flow reversal for cerebral protection that were performed over a 28-month period in 97 patients.
METHODS: The mean age of these patients was 72 years, and 82 (80%) were men. Mean preoperative internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity was 314 cm/s, 36% of treated hemispheres were symptomatic, and 42% of patients had neurologic symptoms for >6 months. Ten patients (10%) had contralateral ICA occlusion, six (6%) had recurrent carotid stenosis, and two (2%) had previous neck radiation. Local anesthesia was used in 72 (70%) cases and general in 31 (30%). Predilatation was used in 34 cases (33%), and closed-cell self-expanding stents were deployed and postdilated in all cases.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100 cases (97%). No major strokes or deaths occurred. One ipsilateral transient ischemic attack (1%), one contralateral transient ischemic attack (1%), and two minor strokes (2%) occurred. There were two wound complications (2%) and one major arterial complication (1%). Mean operative time was 69 minutes, and mean carotid flow reversal time was 21 minutes. Three awake patients (4%) did not tolerate carotid flow reversal. Hypotension/bradycardia occurred in 24 cases (23%). No electrocardiographic myocardial infarctions were diagnosed. At 40 months of follow-up, the stent patency rate on an intention-to-treat basis was 95%, and the stroke-free survival was 91%.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcervical CAS with carotid flow reversal can be done with a high rate of technical success, a negligible rate of major adverse events, and an excellent 3-year stroke-free survival and stent patency rate. These results compare favorably with those of recently published prospective studies using distal filter protection during CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980271     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  3 in total

1.  The evolution of transcarotid artery stenting with flow reversal.

Authors:  Rafael Demarchi Malgor; Rasesh Mahendra Shah
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2019-10-23

2.  Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting without flow reversal: A case report.

Authors:  Nguyen-Luu Giang; Tran Chi Cuong; Le Minh Thang; Ngo Minh Tuan; Nguyen-Dao Nhat Huy; Duong-Hoang Linh; Mai-Van Muong; Do Duc Thang; Nguyen-Van Trang; Nguyen Minh Duc
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-28

Review 3.  Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  O Petr; W Brinjikji; M H Murad; B Glodny; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.