Literature DB >> 17980250

Safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: primary results of the DISPERSE-2 trial.

Christopher P Cannon1, Steen Husted, Robert A Harrington, Benjamin M Scirica, Håkan Emanuelsson, Gary Peters, Robert F Storey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the safety and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS).
BACKGROUND: AZD6140 achieves higher mean levels of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
METHODS: A total of 990 patients with NSTE-ACS, treated with aspirin and standard therapy for ACS, were randomized in a 1:1:1 double-blind fashion to receive either twice-daily AZD6140 90 mg, AZD6140 180 mg, or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose plus 75 mg once daily for up to 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The primary end point, the Kaplan-Meier rate of major or minor bleeding through 4 weeks, was 8.1% in the clopidogrel group, 9.8% in the AZD6140 90-mg group, and 8.0% in the AZD6140 180-mg group (p = 0.43 and p = 0.96, respectively, vs. clopidogrel); the major bleeding rates were 6.9%, 7.1%, and 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.91 and p = 0.35, respectively, vs. clopidogrel). Although not statistically significant, favorable trends were seen in the Kaplan-Meier rates of myocardial infarction (MI) over the entire study period (MI: 5.6%, 3.8%, and 2.5%, respectively; p = 0.41 and p = 0.06, respectively, vs. clopidogrel). In a post-hoc analysis of continuous electrocardiograms, mostly asymptomatic ventricular pauses >2.5 s were more common, especially in the AZD6140 180-mg group (4.3%, 5.5%, and 9.9%, respectively; p = 0.58 and p = 0.01, respectively, vs. clopidogrel).
CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience with AZD6140 in patients with ACS showed no difference in major bleeding but an increase in minor bleeding at the higher dose with encouraging results on the secondary end point of MI. This agent is currently being studied in a large outcomes trial in 18,000 patients with ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980250     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  105 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single and multiple doses of ticagrelor in healthy Chinese subjects: an open-label, sequential, two-cohort, single-centre study.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Kathleen Butler; Li Yang; Zhenghua Yang; Renli Teng
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  New antithrombotic drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John W Eikelboom; Meyer Michel Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of ticagrelor in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kathleen Butler; Renli Teng
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Current status of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with coronary or peripheral arterial disease: Mechanisms, evaluation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stavros Spiliopoulos; Georgios Pastromas
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-26

Review 5.  State of the art of new P2Y12 antagonists.

Authors:  Marco Cattaneo; Gian Marco Podda
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  Use of novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Michael Luna; Elizabeth M Holper
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Which antiplatelet agent for whom? Which patient populations benefit most from novel antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor, prasugrel)?

Authors:  Christoph Varenhorst; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  High residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel: its significance and therapeutic challenges overcoming clopidogrel resistance.

Authors:  Torkom Garabedian; Samir Alam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03

9.  Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Renli Teng; Patrick Mitchell; Kathleen Butler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Real-world incidence of patient-reported dyspnoea with ticagrelor.

Authors:  Adaire E Prosser; Jessica L Dawson; KethLyn Koo; Karen M O'Kane; Michael B Ward; Richard J Woodman; Arduino A Mangoni; Cameron J Phillips
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2018-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.