OBJECTIVE: While fatigue after stroke is a common problem, it has no generally accepted definition. Our aim was to develop a case definition for post-stroke fatigue and to test its psychometric properties. METHODS: A case definition with face validity and an associated structured interview was constructed. After initial piloting, the feasibility, reliability (test-retest and inter-rater) and concurrent validity (in relation to four fatigue severity scales) were determined in 55 patients with stroke. RESULTS: All participating patients provided satisfactory answers to all the case definition probe questions demonstrating its feasibility For test-retest reliability, kappa was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94, P<.01) and for inter-rater reliability kappa was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.62-0.99, P<.01). Patients fulfilling the case definition also had substantially higher fatigue scores on four fatigue severity scales (P<.001) indicating concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The proposed case definition is feasible to administer and reliable in practice, and there is evidence of concurrent validity. It requires further evaluation in different settings.
OBJECTIVE: While fatigue after stroke is a common problem, it has no generally accepted definition. Our aim was to develop a case definition for post-stroke fatigue and to test its psychometric properties. METHODS: A case definition with face validity and an associated structured interview was constructed. After initial piloting, the feasibility, reliability (test-retest and inter-rater) and concurrent validity (in relation to four fatigue severity scales) were determined in 55 patients with stroke. RESULTS: All participating patients provided satisfactory answers to all the case definition probe questions demonstrating its feasibility For test-retest reliability, kappa was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94, P<.01) and for inter-rater reliability kappa was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.62-0.99, P<.01). Patients fulfilling the case definition also had substantially higher fatigue scores on four fatigue severity scales (P<.001) indicating concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The proposed case definition is feasible to administer and reliable in practice, and there is evidence of concurrent validity. It requires further evaluation in different settings.
Authors: Kristine A Donovan; Kevin D Stein; Morgan Lee; Corinne R Leach; Onaedo Ilozumba; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Simiao Wu; Mansur A Kutlubaev; Ho-Yan Y Chun; Eileen Cowey; Alex Pollock; Malcolm R Macleod; Martin Dennis; Elizabeth Keane; Michael Sharpe; Gillian E Mead Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-07-02
Authors: Mansur A Kutlubaev; Susan D Shenkin; Andrew J Farrall; Fiona H Duncan; Susan J Lewis; Carolyn A Greig; Martin S Dennis; Joanna M Wardlaw; Alasdair M J Maclullich; Gillian E Mead Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Date: 2013-03-22
Authors: Stefania Fugazzaro; Monica Denti; Monia Allisen Accogli; Stefania Costi; Donatella Pagliacci; Simona Calugi; Enrica Cavalli; Mariangela Taricco; Roberta Bardelli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Roger J Mills; Julie F Pallant; Maria Koufali; Anil Sharma; Suzanne Day; Alan Tennant; Carolyn A Young Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.186