Literature DB >> 17980182

Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 14(0/7)-25(6/7) weeks: results from the EM-PEC international cohort study.

Leonardo Pereira1, Amanda Cotter, Ricardo Gómez, Vincenzo Berghella, Witoon Prasertcharoensuk, Juha Rasanen, Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana, Suneeta Mittal, Sean Daly, Jim Airoldi, Jorge E Tolosa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in selected women with a dilated cervix who underwent expectant management or physical examination-indicated cerclage. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a historical cohort study conducted by the Global Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Health. Women between 14(0/7) and 25(6/7) weeks' gestation with a dilated cervix were identified at 10 centers by ultrasound or digital examination. Primary outcome was time from presentation until delivery (weeks). Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks. Multivariate regression was used to assess the likelihood of neonatal outcomes and control for confounders.
RESULTS: Of 225 women, 152 received a physical examination-indicated cerclage, and 73 were managed expectantly without cerclage. Cervical dilation, gestational age at presentation, and antenatal steroid use differed between groups. In the adjusted analyses, cerclage was associated with longer interval from presentation until delivery, improved neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks, compared with expectant management. Similar results were obtained in the analyses limited to women dilated between 2 and 4 cm (n = 122).
CONCLUSION: In this study, the largest cohort reported to date, physical examination-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation and improve neonatal survival, compared with expectant management in selected women with cervical dilation between 14(0/7) and 25(6/7) weeks. A randomized, controlled trial should be conducted to determine whether these potential benefits outweigh the risks of cerclage placement in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980182     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Injectable silk-based biomaterials for cervical tissue augmentation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Joseph E Brown; Benjamin P Partlow; Alison M Berman; Michael D House; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Kyung Joon Oh; Roberto Romero; Jee Yoon Park; JoonHo Lee; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Joon-Seok Hong; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Sarah L Cohen; Thomas F McElrath; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

4.  Rescue cerclage in IVF pregnancies with second trimester cervical dilatation: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Banu Kumbak; Rukset Attar; Gazi Yıldırım; Narter Yeşildağlar; Cem Fıçıcıoğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Biocompatibility of a sonicated silk gel for cervical injection during pregnancy: in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Agatha S Critchfield; Reid Mccabe; Nikolai Klebanov; Lauren Richey; Simona Socrate; Errol R Norwitz; David L Kaplan; Michael House
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Silk-based injectable biomaterial as an alternative to cervical cerclage: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Asha J Heard; Simona Socrate; Kelly A Burke; Errol R Norwitz; David L Kaplan; Michael D House
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 7.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-06

Review 8.  Care for women with prior preterm birth.

Authors:  Jay D Iams; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Predicting asymptomatic cervical dilation in pregnant patients with short mid-trimester cervical length: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rupsa C Boelig; Lorraine Dugoff; Amanda Roman; Vincenzo Berghella; Jack Ludmir
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Emergency cerclage placement in multifetal pregnancies with a dilated cervix and exposed membranes: case series.

Authors:  Marijo Aguilera; Kirk Ramin; Ruby Nguyen; Lauren Giacobbe; Jessica Swartout
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.