Literature DB >> 1797995

Ambulatory blood pressure normalcy: the PAMELA Study.

G Cesana1, G De Vito, M Ferrario, A Libretti, G Mancia, P Mocarelli, R Sega, F Valagussa, A Zanchetti.   

Abstract

Although ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is gaining in popularity, it still has important limitations in clinical use, particularly for the definition and diagnosis of hypertension. Various attempts have been made to calculate 'normal' or 'reference' values for ambulatory blood pressure, mostly by 24-h non-invasive monitoring in groups of 'normal' subjects. The most appropriate approach, however, is to compare 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values and casual or clinic blood pressure values in a random sample of a suitably large population. The PAMELA Study has been planned to obtain an epidemiological evaluation of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values, and its design is described here. In the city of Monza, 2400 subjects aged between 25 and 64 years have been randomly selected according to World Health Organization Monitoring Cardiovascular Diseases (WHO-MONICA) project criteria within sex and age strata. In these subjects, clinic blood pressure, random-zero blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure (24-h monitoring with SpaceLabs 90207; Redmond, Washington, USA), home blood pressure, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic indices, cardiovascular risk factors and psychological variables are being measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1797995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl        ISSN: 0952-1178


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Pamela study: main findings and perspectives.

Authors:  Michele Bombelli; Elena Toso; Maria Peronio; Danilo Fodri; Marco Volpe; Gianmaria Brambilla; Rita Facchetti; Roberto Sega; Guido Grassi; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  J A Staessen; E T O'Brien; L Thijs; R H Fagard
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  The 24-hour efficacy of a new once-daily formulation of nifedipine. Italian Nifedipine GITS Study Group.

Authors:  A Zanchetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Social status and cardiovascular disease: a Mediterranean case. Results from the Italian Progetto CUORE cohort study.

Authors:  Carla Fornari; Chiara Donfrancesco; Michele A Riva; Luigi Palmieri; Salvatore Panico; Diego Vanuzzo; Marco M Ferrario; Lorenza Pilotto; Simona Giampaoli; Giancarlo Cesana
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Job strain and the incidence of coronary heart diseases: does the association differ among occupational classes? A contribution from a pooled analysis of Northern Italian cohorts.

Authors:  Marco M Ferrario; Giovanni Veronesi; Lorenza Bertù; Guido Grassi; Giancarlo Cesana
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cardiovascular disease prevention at the workplace: assessing the prognostic value of lifestyle risk factors and job-related conditions.

Authors:  Giovanni Veronesi; Rossana Borchini; Paul Landsbergis; Licia Iacoviello; Francesco Gianfagna; Patrick Tayoun; Guido Grassi; Giancarlo Cesana; Marco Mario Ferrario
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Long-term prediction of major coronary or ischaemic stroke event in a low-incidence Southern European population: model development and evaluation of clinical utility.

Authors:  Giovanni Veronesi; Francesco Gianfagna; Lloyd E Chambless; Simona Giampaoli; Giuseppe Mancia; Giancarlo Cesana; Marco M Ferrario
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.