Literature DB >> 17978111

Pregnancy risk among oral contraceptive pill, injectable contraceptive, and condom users in Uganda, zimbabwe, and Thailand.

Markus J Steiner1, Cynthia Kwok, Rosalie Dominik, Josaphat K Byamugisha, Tsungai Chipato, Thulani Magwali, Francis Mmiro, Sungwal Rugpao, Somchai Sriplienchan, Charles S Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the probability of pregnancy for oral contraceptive pill (OCP), injectable contraceptive, and condom users in Uganda, Thailand, and Zimbabwe.
METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of 5,224 women who participated in a prospective study evaluating the association between hormonal contraception and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition.
RESULTS: The overall 12-month cumulative probability of pregnancy of injectable contraceptive users was 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-1.0), with similar risks in Uganda (0.3%, 95% CI 0-0.7), Thailand (0.6%, 95% CI 0-1.2), and Zimbabwe (1.0%, 95% CI 0.3-1.7). The 12-month cumulative probability of pregnancy for OCP users was 9.5% (95% CI 8.1-11.0%), with similar risks of pregnancy in Uganda and Zimbabwe (14.6%, 95% CI 11.7-17.4; and 10.2%, 95% CI 8.0-12.5, respectively) but substantially lower risk in Thailand (0.5%, 95% CI 0-1.2). The overall 12-month cumulative probability of pregnancy for women intending to use a given method at baseline was 2.0% (95% CI 1.4-2.6%) for injectable contraceptives, 15.7% (95% CI 14.1-17.3%) for OCPs, and 25.8% (95% CI 23.2-28.4) for condoms. Women in Thailand experienced lower pregnancy risk with condoms (18.4%, 95% CI 11.1-25.7) than in Uganda (29.5%, 95% CI 25.7-33.4), and Zimbabwe (23.3%, 95% CI 19.4-27.2).
CONCLUSION: The overall risk of pregnancy for injectable contraceptive users was substantially lower than for oral contraceptive pill users. However, Thai participants had similarly low cumulative pregnancy probabilities for both methods. Women receiving contraceptive counseling should be informed that their experience with a given method may differ from the average or typical-use pregnancy rates often discussed during contraceptive counseling. Tailored counseling is necessary for women to make informed choices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17978111     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268804.98744.2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention does not diminish the pregnancy prevention effectiveness of hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Pamela M Murnane; Renee Heffron; Allan Ronald; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Deborah Donnell; Nelly R Mugo; Edwin Were; Andrew Mujugira; James Kiarie; Connie Celum; Jared M Baeten
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 2.  Drug interactions between hormonal contraceptives and antiretrovirals.

Authors:  Kavita Nanda; Gretchen S Stuart; Jennifer Robinson; Andrew L Gray; Naomi K Tepper; Mary E Gaffield
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  FIGO's ethical recommendations on female sterilisation will do more harm than good: a commentary.

Authors:  D A A Verkuyl
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Efficacy of a combined contraceptive regimen consisting of condoms and emergency contraception pills.

Authors:  Rui Zhao; Jun-Qing Wu; Yu-Yan Li; Ying Zhou; Hong-Lei Ji; Yi-Ran Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.