OBJECTIVE: To assess tolerance and safety of 0.6% chlorhexidine vaginal and neonatal wipes to improve perinatal outcomes in home deliveries in Pakistan and the ability of traditional birth attendants and project staff to perform a randomized trial of this intervention. METHODS: Focus groups of pregnant and nonpregnant women and in-depth interviews of traditional birth attendants explored barriers to the use of chlorhexidine wipes. Then, a study was performed of women delivering at home attended by traditional birth attendants. Consenting women were randomly assigned to receive either 0.6% chlorhexidine or saline vaginal and neonatal wipes. Women and their infants were followed up on postpartum days 7, 14, and 28. Acceptability and tolerance of vaginal and neonatal wipes, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, were assessed. RESULTS: The focus groups and interviews indicated that the chlorhexidine intervention would be acceptable to women and their providers. Of the 213 eligible pregnant women approached, 203 (95%) gave informed consent and were enrolled and allocated to groups. Traditional birth attendants had no difficulty administering chlorhexidine vaginal and neonatal wipes in a home setting. Of the 203 births, 103 (51%) of whom received 0.6% chlorhexidine, there were no allergic reactions, vaginal itching, burning, or requests for study termination. Follow-up at 28 days postpartum was more than 95%. Although this study was not powered to show significant differences in neonatal outcomes between treatment groups, the lower rates of some neonatal adverse clinical outcomes in the chlorhexidine group were encouraging. CONCLUSION: Use of 0.6% chlorhexidine vaginal and neonatal wipes for the prevention of neonatal infection is well-tolerated and seems safe. A trial of this intervention by traditional birth attendants in a home-delivery setting is feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00121394 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess tolerance and safety of 0.6% chlorhexidine vaginal and neonatal wipes to improve perinatal outcomes in home deliveries in Pakistan and the ability of traditional birth attendants and project staff to perform a randomized trial of this intervention. METHODS: Focus groups of pregnant and nonpregnant women and in-depth interviews of traditional birth attendants explored barriers to the use of chlorhexidine wipes. Then, a study was performed of women delivering at home attended by traditional birth attendants. Consenting women were randomly assigned to receive either 0.6% chlorhexidine or saline vaginal and neonatal wipes. Women and their infants were followed up on postpartum days 7, 14, and 28. Acceptability and tolerance of vaginal and neonatal wipes, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, were assessed. RESULTS: The focus groups and interviews indicated that the chlorhexidine intervention would be acceptable to women and their providers. Of the 213 eligible pregnant women approached, 203 (95%) gave informed consent and were enrolled and allocated to groups. Traditional birth attendants had no difficulty administering chlorhexidine vaginal and neonatal wipes in a home setting. Of the 203 births, 103 (51%) of whom received 0.6% chlorhexidine, there were no allergic reactions, vaginal itching, burning, or requests for study termination. Follow-up at 28 days postpartum was more than 95%. Although this study was not powered to show significant differences in neonatal outcomes between treatment groups, the lower rates of some neonatal adverse clinical outcomes in the chlorhexidine group were encouraging. CONCLUSION: Use of 0.6% chlorhexidine vaginal and neonatal wipes for the prevention of neonatal infection is well-tolerated and seems safe. A trial of this intervention by traditional birth attendants in a home-delivery setting is feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00121394 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Authors: Sarah Saleem; Dwight J Rouse; Elizabeth M McClure; Anita Zaidi; Tahira Reza; Y Yahya; I A Memon; N H Khan; G Memon; N Soomro; Omrana Pasha; Linda L Wright; Janet Moore; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Luke C Mullany; Subarna K Khatry; Jeevan B Sherchand; Steven C LeClerq; Gary L Darmstadt; Joanne Katz; Punita Gauchan; Ramesh K Adhikari; Ashma Rana; James M Tielsch Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Luke C Mullany; Anne C C Lee; Kate Kerber; Steve Wall; Gary L Darmstadt; Joy E Lawn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Archana Patel; Sherri Bucher; Yamini Pusdekar; Fabian Esamai; Nancy F Krebs; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Elwyn Chomba; Ana Garces; Omrana Pasha; Sarah Saleem; Bhalachandra S Kodkany; Edward A Liechty; Bhala Kodkany; Richard J Derman; Waldemar A Carlo; K Hambidge; Robert L Goldenberg; Fernando Althabe; Mabel Berrueta; Janet L Moore; Elizabeth M McClure; Marion Koso-Thomas; Patricia L Hibberd Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Aamer Imdad; Resti Ma M Bautista; Kathlynne Anne A Senen; Ma Esterlita V Uy; Jacinto Blas Mantaring; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-05-31