Literature DB >> 17977760

Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease in pigs: evaluation and optimisation of instrumentation and techniques.

Claudia M F Amaral Doel1, John Gloster, Jean-Francois Valarcher.   

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) can be transmitted in a variety of ways, one of which is through virus exhaled into the air by infected livestock. It is clear that where there is close contact there will be a range of possible mechanisms for the transmission of disease from animal to animal, including the airborne route if simple barriers between livestock exist. In transmission of FMD over longer distances, airborne transmission represents a significant challenge to the veterinary services in that the mechanism is essentially uncontrollable if the primary source of the disease is not contained. In the event of an epidemic of FMD, such as the one experienced in the United Kingdom in 2001, it is important for disease control purposes to understand the contribution made to the overall spread of disease by aerosolised virus. This assessment is based on a combination of measurements made in the laboratory and through clinical observations in the field. To date, laboratory measurements have used a number of instruments that were not specifically designed for working with FMD virus or whose performance have not been fully compared and documented. This paper compares four samplers and describes the method by which samples are processed. Overall it is concluded that there is no optimum air sampling instrument which could be successfully employed for all situations but the work provides guidance to those wishing to make measurements in the future and establishes a baseline against which any new samplers can be compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17977760     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  6 in total

Review 1.  Airborne Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus: A Review of Past and Present Perspectives.

Authors:  Emma Brown; Noel Nelson; Simon Gubbins; Claire Colenutt
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Understanding foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission biology: identification of the indicators of infectiousness.

Authors:  Margo E Chase-Topping; Ian Handel; Bartlomiej M Bankowski; Nicholas D Juleff; Debi Gibson; Sarah J Cox; Miriam A Windsor; Elizabeth Reid; Claudia Doel; Richard Howey; Paul V Barnett; Mark E J Woolhouse; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Predicting the Ability of Preclinical Diagnosis To Improve Control of Farm-to-Farm Foot-and-Mouth Disease Transmission in Cattle.

Authors:  Noel Nelson; David J Paton; Simon Gubbins; Claire Colenutt; Emma Brown; Sophia Hodgson; Jose L Gonzales
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Review of epidemiological risk models for foot-and-mouth disease: Implications for prevention strategies with a focus on Africa.

Authors:  Bachir Souley Kouato; Kris De Clercq; Emmanuel Abatih; Fabiana Dal Pozzo; Donald P King; Eric Thys; Hamani Marichatou; Claude Saegerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Airborne Transmission of a Serotype 4 Fowl Adenovirus in Chickens.

Authors:  Gang Li; Guanliu Yu; Yujuan Niu; Yumei Cai; Sidang Liu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Review on Outbreak Dynamics, the Endemic Serotypes, and Diversified Topotypic Profiles of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus Isolates in Ethiopia from 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Ashenafi Kiros Wubshet; Junfei Dai; Qian Li; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.