Literature DB >> 17977618

Sensory specific satiety and intake: the difference between nibble- and bar-size snacks.

P L G Weijzen1, D G Liem, E H Zandstra, C de Graaf.   

Abstract

The present study investigated (1) whether consumption of a nibble-size snack, as compared to a bar-size snack, leads to more sensory specific satiety (SSS) and a lower intake; and (2) whether attention to consumption, as compared to usual consumption, leads to more SSS and a lower intake. Subjects (N=59) tested two snack foods which differed in size, nibbles and bars, in two consumption conditions. In the attention condition, the instruction to chew the food well was given. In the control condition no such instruction was given. For each of the four SSS sessions ad libitum intake was measured and SSS scores were calculated. Mean intake of the nibbles was 12% lower than of the bars in the control condition, but not in the attention condition. Although non-significantly, attention to consumption tended to reduce intake of the bars but not of the nibbles. SSS scores were slightly higher for the bars than for the nibbles. Our results suggest that a smaller food size results in a lower intake. The data do not clearly support the idea that attention to consumption decreases intake. Hypothetically consumption of small foods and attentive consumption prolong the oral sensory stimulation, which results in a lower intake.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17977618     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  12 in total

1.  Effects of Peanut Processing on Masticatory Performance during Variable Appetitive States.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2009-11-19

2.  An Investigation of Sensory Specific Satiety and Food Size When Children Consume a Whole or Diced Vegetable.

Authors:  Jasmine R Goh; Catherine G Russell; Djin G Liem
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2017-07-24

3.  Presenting a food in multiple smaller units increases expected satiety.

Authors:  Rose E Oldham-Cooper; Laura L Wilkinson; Charlotte A Hardman; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Catriona M M Lakemond; Rene A de Wijk; Pieternel A Luning; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

6.  Children's liking and wanting of snack products: Influence of shape and flavour.

Authors:  Djin G Liem; Liesbeth H Zandstra
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 7.  Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Luigi Palla; Kathryn Guest; Cassandra Ricchiuti; Neil Vint; Susan A Jebb; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.110

8.  Effects of Oral Exposure Duration and Gastric Energy Content on Appetite Ratings and Energy Intake in Lean Men.

Authors:  Anne G M Wijlens; Cees de Graaf; Alfrun Erkner; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Visual Cues on Consumer Emotion and Purchase Intent: A Case of Ready-to-Eat Salad.

Authors:  Pitchayapat Chonpracha; Ryan Ardoin; Yupeng Gao; Pamarin Waimaleongora-Ek; Georgianna Tuuri; Witoon Prinyawiwatkul
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-03-31

10.  Right Sizing: Sensory-Based Product Design Is a Promising Strategy to Nudge Consumers toward Healthier Portions.

Authors:  David Labbe; Lisa R Fries; Aurore Ferrage; Francine Lenfant; Nicolas Godinot; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.