Literature DB >> 17977149

Expression of stress-response proteins upon whitefly-mediated inoculation of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus in susceptible and resistant tomato plants.

Rena Gorovits1, Fouad Akad, Hila Beery, Favi Vidavsky, Assaf Mahadav, Henryk Czosnek.   

Abstract

To better understand the nature of resistance of tomato to the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci, B biotype)-transmitted Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), whiteflies and TYLCV were considered as particular cases of biotic stresses and virus resistance as a particular case of successful response to these stresses. Two inbred tomato lines issued from the same breeding program that used Solanum habrochaites as a TYLCV resistance source, one susceptible and the other resistant, were used to compare the expression of key proteins involved at different stages of the plant response with stresses: mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), cellular heat shock proteins (HSPs, proteases), and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. The two biotic stresses-non-viruliferous whitefly feeding and virus infection with viruliferous insects--led to a slow decline in abundance of MAPKs, HSPs, and chloroplast protease FtsH (but not chloroplast protease ClpC), and induced the activities of the PR proteins, beta-1,3-glucanase, and peroxidase. This decline was less pronounced in virus-resistant than in virus-susceptible lines. Contrary to whitefly infestation and virus infection, inoculation with the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum induced a rapid accumulation of the stress proteins studied, followed by a decline; the virus-susceptible and -resistant tomato lines behaved similarly in response to the fungus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17977149     DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact        ISSN: 0894-0282            Impact factor:   4.171


  17 in total

Review 1.  Application of proteomics to investigate stress-induced proteins for improvement in crop protection.

Authors:  Amber Afroz; Ghulam Muhammad Ali; Asif Mir; Setsuko Komatsu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Tomato contrasting genotypes responses under combined salinity and viral stresses.

Authors:  Charfeddine Gharsallah; Sonia Gharsallah Chouchane; Sirine Werghi; Marwa Mehrez; Hatem Fakhfakh; Faten Gorsane
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2020-06-17

3.  The six Tomato yellow leaf curl virus genes expressed individually in tomato induce different levels of plant stress response attenuation.

Authors:  Rena Gorovits; Adi Moshe; Linoy Amrani; Rotem Kleinberger; Ghandi Anfoka; Henryk Czosnek
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Tomato yellow leaf curl virus infection of a resistant tomato line with a silenced sucrose transporter gene LeHT1 results in inhibition of growth, enhanced virus spread, and necrosis.

Authors:  Assaf Eybishtz; Yuval Peretz; Dagan Sade; Rena Gorovits; Henryk Czosnek
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Silencing of a single gene in tomato plants resistant to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus renders them susceptible to the virus.

Authors:  Assaf Eybishtz; Yuval Peretz; Dagan Sade; Fouad Akad; Henryk Czosnek
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  HSP17.4 mediates salicylic acid and jasmonic acid pathways in the regulation of resistance to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in strawberry.

Authors:  Xianping Fang; Weiguo Chai; Shuigen Li; Liqing Zhang; Hong Yu; Jiansheng Shen; Wenfei Xiao; Aichun Liu; Boqiang Zhou; Xueying Zhang
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.663

7.  Assessing Global Transcriptome Changes in Response to South African Cassava Mosaic Virus [ZA-99] Infection in Susceptible Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Erica J Pierce; M E Chrissie Rey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rice sHsp genes: genomic organization and expression profiling under stress and development.

Authors:  Neelam K Sarkar; Yeon-Ki Kim; Anil Grover
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Comparative transcriptome profiling of a resistant vs. susceptible tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar in response to infection by tomato yellow leaf curl virus.

Authors:  Tianzi Chen; Yuanda Lv; Tongming Zhao; Nan Li; Yuwen Yang; Wengui Yu; Xin He; Tingli Liu; Baolong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recruitment of the host plant heat shock protein 70 by Tomato yellow leaf curl virus coat protein is required for virus infection.

Authors:  Rena Gorovits; Adi Moshe; Murad Ghanim; Henryk Czosnek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.