Literature DB >> 17976724

A value-based medicine analysis of ranibizumab for the treatment of subfoveal neovascular macular degeneration.

Melissa M Brown1, Gary C Brown, Heidi C Brown, Jonathan Peet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the conferred value and average cost-utility (cost-effectiveness) for intravitreal ranibizumab used to treat occult/minimally classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
DESIGN: Value-based medicine cost-utility analysis. PARTICIPANTS: MARINA (Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular AMD) Study patients utilizing published primary data.
METHODS: Reference case, third-party insurer perspective, cost-utility analysis using 2006 United States dollars. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conferred value in the forms of (1) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and (2) percent improvement in health-related quality of life. Cost-utility is expressed in terms of dollars expended per QALY gained. All outcomes are discounted at a 3% annual rate, as recommended by the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Data are presented for the second-eye model, first-eye model, and combined model.
RESULTS: Twenty-two intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab administered over a 2-year period confer 1.039 QALYs, or a 15.8% improvement in quality of life for the 12-year period of the second-eye model reference case of occult/minimally classic age-related subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. The reference case treatment cost is $52652, and the cost-utility for the second-eye model is $50691/QALY. The quality-of-life gain from the first-eye model is 6.4% and the cost-utility is $123887, whereas the most clinically simulating combined model yields a quality-of-life gain of 10.4% and cost-utility of $74169.
CONCLUSIONS: By conventional standards and the most commonly used second-eye and combined models, intravitreal ranibizumab administered for occult/minimally classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization is a cost-effective therapy. Ranibizumab treatment confers considerably greater value than other neovascular macular degeneration pharmaceutical therapies that have been studied in randomized clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17976724     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  25 in total

Review 1.  The cost-effectiveness of biopharmaceuticals: a look at the evidence.

Authors:  Andrew W Wilson; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Delay between medical indication to anti-VEGF treatment in age-related macular degeneration can result in a loss of visual acuity.

Authors:  Philipp Sebastian Muether; Manuel M Hermann; Konrad Koch; Sascha Fauser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Assessment of targeting accuracy of a low-energy stereotactic radiosurgery treatment for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Erik Chell; Steven Hansen; Michael Gertner; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Cost-Effectiveness Models in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Issues and Challenges.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Carolyn K Hulme-Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Tavag Mrinalini; Paul P Lee; David W Hutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Decisional answer tree analysis of exudative age-related macular degeneration treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Shi Zhuan Tan; Augustinus Laude; Peter A Aspinall; Anna M Ambrecht; Archana Vani; Baljean Dhillon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  The cost-utility of aflibercept for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration compared to bevacizumab and ranibizumab and the influence of model parameters.

Authors:  Mari Elshout; Margriet I van der Reis; Carroll A B Webers; Jan S A G Schouten
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Ranibizumab: a review of its use in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Sharon D Solomon; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Magdalena G Krzystolik; Barbara S Hawkins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-29

10.  Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Is it safe?

Authors:  Dimitrios A Karagiannis; Ioannis D Ladas; Efstratios Parikakis; Ilias Georgalas; Athanasios Kotsolis; Giorgos Amariotakis; Vasileios Soumplis; Panagiotis Mitropoulos
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.