Literature DB >> 17976538

Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.

Stefan R Schweinberger1, Jürgen M Kaufmann, Stephan Moratti, Andreas Keil, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

Recent studies have identified a prominent face-selective ERP response to immediate repetitions of faces approximately 250 ms (N250r) which was strongly attenuated or eliminated for control stimuli (Schweinberger, Huddy, and Burton 2004, NeuroReport, 15, 1501-1505). In the present study we used a 148-channel whole head neuromagnetometer to investigate event-related magnetic fields (ERMFs) elicited by repetitions of exemplars of human faces, inverted human faces, primate faces, and car fronts. Participants counted rare pictures of butterflies interspersed in a series of pairs of one of these categories. The second stimulus of each pair could either be a repetition or a non-repetition of the first stimulus. We observed prominent M100 (90-140 ms) and M170 (140-220 ms) responses. Both M100 and M170 were insensitive to repetition and showed little differences between stimulus categories, except for a slight increase and delay of M170 to inverted faces. By contrast, we observed a repetition-sensitive M250r response (220-330 ms). This M250r was larger for upright human and primate faces when compared to both inverted human faces and cars, a finding that was specific for right hemispheric sensors. Source localization suggested different generators for M170 and M250r in occipitotemporal and fusiform areas, respectively. These findings suggest that repetition-sensitive brain activity approximately 250 ms reflects the transient activation of object representations, with largest responses for upright faces, in the right hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17976538     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  16 in total

1.  Face activated neurodynamic cortical networks.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Doug Ranken; Selma Supek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The fusiform response to faces: explicit versus implicit processing of emotion.

Authors:  Justin F Monroe; Mark Griffin; Amy Pinkham; James Loughead; Ruben C Gur; Timothy P L Roberts; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Abraham Goldstein; Yuval Harpaz; Myriam Hansel; Elana Zion-Golumbic; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The neural sources of N170: Understanding timing of activation in face-selective areas.

Authors:  Chuanji Gao; Stefania Conte; John E Richards; Wanze Xie; Taylor Hanayik
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  MEG Adaptation Resolves the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Face-Sensitive Brain Responses.

Authors:  Michael I G Simpson; Sam R Johnson; Garreth Prendergast; Athanasios V Kokkinakis; Eileanoir Johnson; Gary G R Green; Patrick J Johnston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity: a replication study.

Authors:  Werner Sommer; Katarzyna Stapor; Grzegorz Kończak; Krzysztof Kotowski; Piotr Fabian; Jeremi Ochab; Anna Bereś; Grażyna Ślusarczyk
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  The role of gamma-band activity in the representation of faces: reduced activity in the fusiform face area in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Christian Dobel; Markus Junghöfer; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: a replication and extension.

Authors:  Laura Kaltwasser; Andrea Hildebrandt; Guillermo Recio; Oliver Wilhelm; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  GALA: group analysis leads to accuracy, a novel approach for solving the inverse problem in exploratory analysis of group MEG recordings.

Authors:  Vladimir V Kozunov; Alexei Ossadtchi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Who needs a referee? How incorrect basketball actions are automatically detected by basketball players' brain.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Nicola Crotti; Mirella Manfredi; Roberta Adorni; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.