Literature DB >> 17976358

Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease: overcoming the pharmacological and pharmacoeconomic limitations of existing therapies.

Jay B Wish1, Daniel W Coyne.   

Abstract

Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is characterized by a glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (reference range, 90-200 mL/min/1.73m2 for a 20-year-old, with a decrease of 4 mL/min per decade), affects approximately 8 million people in the United States. Anemia is common in patients with stage 3 CKD and, if not corrected, contributes to a poor quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), introduced almost 2 decades ago, have replaced transfusions as first-line therapy for anemia. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of ESAs in the primary care of patients with anemia of CKD and discusses pharmacological and pharmacoeconomic issues raised by recent data. Relevant studies in the English language were identified by searching the MEDLINE database (1987-2006). Two ESAs are currently available in the United States, epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. More frequent dosing with epoetin alfa is recommended by the labeled administration guidelines because it has a shorter half-life than darbepoetin alfa. Clinical experience also supports extended dosing intervals for both these ESAs. Use of ESAs in the management of anemia of CKD is associated with improved quality of life, increased survival, and decreased progression of renal failure. Some evidence suggests that ESAs have a cardioprotective effect. However, correction of anemia to hemoglobin levels greater than 12 g/dL (to convert to g/L, multiply by 10) appears to increase the risk of adverse cardiac outcomes and progression of kidney disease in some patients. The prescription of ESAs in the primary care setting requires an understanding of the accepted use of these agents, the associated pharmacoeconomic challenges, and the potential risks. This review considers the need to balance effective ESA dosing intervals against the potential risks of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17976358     DOI: 10.4065/82.11.1371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  5 in total

1.  Monthly administration of a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator provides efficient haemoglobin control in non-dialysis patients during routine clinical practice: results from the non-interventional, single-cohort, multicentre, SUPRA study.

Authors:  Stefan Heidenreich; Frank Leistikow; Stefan Zinn; Jörg Baumann; Andreas Atzeni; Vitomir Bajeski; Jörn Dietzmann; Gert-Peter Dragoun
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  [The role of erythropoietin in improvement of wound healing].

Authors:  H Sorg; J W Kuhbier; B Menger; K Reimers; Y Harder; P M Vogt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta: a review of its use in the management of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Paul L McCormack
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  An Exploratory Study of Daprodustat in Erythropoietin-Hyporesponsive Subjects.

Authors:  Borut Cizman; Andy P Sykes; Gitanjali Paul; Steven Zeig; Alexander R Cobitz
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-03-03

5.  A retrospective case-control analysis of the outpatient expenditures for western medicine and dental treatment modalities in CKD patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ren-Yeong Huang; Yuh-Feng Lin; Sen-Yeong Kao; Yi-Shing Shieh; Jin-Shuen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.