Literature DB >> 17976332

Percutaneous stenting of superior vena cava syndrome: treatment outcome in patients with benign and malignant etiology.

Neal R Barshes1, Suman Annambhotla, Hosam F El Sayed, Tam T Huynh, Panagiotis Kougias, Alan Dardik, Peter H Lin.   

Abstract

Symptomatic obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC) can be caused by either intrathoracic malignancy or nonmalignant etiology resulting in superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of percutaneous stenting of SVCS in patients with malignant and benign disease. During a 9-year period, 56 patients with SVCS underwent percutaneous stenting placement. Among them, malignant and benign disease was responsible for 40 patients (71%) and 16 patients (29%), respectively. The Wallstent was the most commonly used stent and was used in 45 patients (80%), whereas the Palmaz stent was used in 6 patients (11%). In 38 patients (68%), a single stent was deployed to treat an SVC lesion. In contrast, bilateral kissing stents were deployed in 9 patients (16%), which extended from bilateral brachiocephalic veins to the proximal SVC. Technical success was achieved in all patients while symptomatic improvement was noted in 54 patients (96%). No procedural complications occurred in this series. Primary patency in malignant and benign cases at 1 year was 64% and 76%, respectively. Overall symptom-free survival ranged from 1 to 34 months. Our study showed that endovascular treatment with percutaneous stenting provides an effective treatment strategy in patients with SVCS caused by either malignant or benign disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17976332     DOI: 10.2310/6670.2007.00067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vascular        ISSN: 1708-5381            Impact factor:   1.285


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Covered Versus Uncovered Stents for Benign Superior Vena Cava (SVC) Obstruction.

Authors:  Mustafa M Haddad; Benjamin Simmons; Ian R McPhail; Manju Kalra; Melissa J Neisen; Matthew P Johnson; Andrew H Stockland; James C Andrews; Sanjay Misra; Haraldur Bjarnason
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Wallstent: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ali Kordzadeh; Alan Askari; Muhammad A Hanif; Vijay Gadhvi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2022-06-25

3.  Endovascular Stenting in 2 Patients with Benign Superior Vena Cava Syndrome.

Authors:  Jared B Hooker; Beau M Hawkins; Mazen S Abu-Fadel
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-08-01

4.  Change from Cardioinhibitory Syncope to Iatrogenic Positional Syncope: Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Treated by Superior Vena Cava Stenting and Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.

Authors:  Firdevs A Ekizler; Ozcan Ozeke; Riza S Okten; Emek Edipoglu; Firat Ozcan; Serkan Cay; Serkan Topaloglu; Dursun Aras
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-09-15

5.  Endovascular therapy for superior vena cava syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdul Hussain Azizi; Irfan Shafi; Matthew Zhao; Saurav Chatterjee; Stephanie Clare Roth; Maninder Singh; Vladimir Lakhter; Riyaz Bashir
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 6.  Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eri Yin-Soe Aung; Maha Khan; Norman Williams; Usman Raja; Mohamad Hamady
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.797

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.