BACKGROUND: Guidelines for depression management have been developed but little is known about GP and patient goals, which are likely to influence treatment offers, uptake, and adherence. AIM: To identify issues of importance to GPs, patients, and patients' supporters regarding depression management. GP and patient goals for depression management became a focus of the study. DESIGN OF STUDY: Grounded theory-based qualitative study. SETTING: GPs were drawn from 28 practices. The majority of patients and supporters were recruited from 10 of these practices. METHOD: Sixty-one patients (28 depressed, 18 previously depressed, 15 never depressed), 18 supporters, and 32 GPs were interviewed. RESULTS: GPs described encouraging patients to view depression as separate from the self and 'normal' sadness. Patients and supporters often questioned such boundaries, rejecting the notion of a medical cure and emphasising self-management. The majority of participants who were considering depression-management strategies wanted to 'get out' of their depression. However, a quarter did not see this as immediately relevant or achievable. They focused on getting by from day to day, which had the potential to clash with GP priorities. GP frustration and uncertainty could occur when depression was resistant to cure. Participants identified the importance of GPs listening to patients, but often felt that this did not happen. CONCLUSION: Physicians need greater awareness of the extent to which their goals for the management of depression are perceived as relevant or achievable by patients. Future research should explore methods of negotiating agreed strategies for management.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for depression management have been developed but little is known about GP and patient goals, which are likely to influence treatment offers, uptake, and adherence. AIM: To identify issues of importance to GPs, patients, and patients' supporters regarding depression management. GP and patient goals for depression management became a focus of the study. DESIGN OF STUDY: Grounded theory-based qualitative study. SETTING: GPs were drawn from 28 practices. The majority of patients and supporters were recruited from 10 of these practices. METHOD: Sixty-one patients (28 depressed, 18 previously depressed, 15 never depressed), 18 supporters, and 32 GPs were interviewed. RESULTS: GPs described encouraging patients to view depression as separate from the self and 'normal' sadness. Patients and supporters often questioned such boundaries, rejecting the notion of a medical cure and emphasising self-management. The majority of participants who were considering depression-management strategies wanted to 'get out' of their depression. However, a quarter did not see this as immediately relevant or achievable. They focused on getting by from day to day, which had the potential to clash with GP priorities. GP frustration and uncertainty could occur when depression was resistant to cure. Participants identified the importance of GPs listening to patients, but often felt that this did not happen. CONCLUSION: Physicians need greater awareness of the extent to which their goals for the management of depression are perceived as relevant or achievable by patients. Future research should explore methods of negotiating agreed strategies for management.
Authors: E H Lin; G E Simon; W J Katon; J E Russo; M Von Korff; T M Bush; E J Ludman; E A Walker Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Titus W D P van Os; Rob H S van den Brink; Bea G Tiemens; Jack A Jenner; Klaas van der Meer; Johan Ormel Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Carl May; Gayle Allison; Alison Chapple; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Clare Dixon; Linda Gask; Ruth Graham; Anne Rogers; Martin Roland Journal: Sociol Health Illn Date: 2004-03
Authors: Franca Warmenhoven; Eric van Rijswijk; Elise van Hoogstraten; Karel van Spaendonck; Peter Lucassen; Judith Prins; Kris Vissers; Chris van Weel Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Rebecca Dickinson; Peter Knapp; Allan O House; Vandana Dimri; Arnold Zermansky; Duncan Petty; John Holmes; David K Raynor Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jane M Gunn; Victoria J Palmer; Christopher F Dowrick; Helen E Herrman; Frances E Griffiths; Renata Kokanovic; Grant A Blashki; Kelsey L Hegarty; Caroline L Johnson; Maria Potiriadis; Carl R May Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Victoria Palmer; Jane Gunn; Renata Kokanovic; Frances Griffiths; Bradley Shrimpton; Rosalind Hurworth; Helen Herrman; Caroline Johnson; Kelsey Hegarty; Grant Blashki; Ella Butler; Kate Johnston-Ata'ata; Christopher Dowrick Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 2.267