P J Bousquet1, A Pipet, L Bousquet-Rouanet, P Demoly. 1. Exploration des Allergies, Maladies Respiratoires and INSERM, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: beta-lactams continue to remain the most commonly involved drug family in allergic drug reactions. They are often essential and there is a cost-effective and favourable risk-benefit ratio for the exploration of all suspicions of beta-lactam allergy. A firm diagnosis is always based on skin tests and sometimes on provocation tests. Recommendations have been published by allergy societies and distinguished scientists but they are not always concordant and can lead to some confusion for the practicing allergologist. The situation has even worsened since the world wide withdrawal of these penicillin determinants and since the predominance of amoxicillin and cephalosporin prescriptions in most countries. OBJECTIVE - METHOD: In a recent article, it was stated that patients with a penicillin allergy history and negative skin tests to major and minor penicillin determinants are at a low risk of relapse (0-5%) when receiving a beta-lactam. In this paper, our Drug Allergy and Hypersensitivity Database, a cohort database, was used to demonstrate that this statement is false. Standardized European Network for Drug Allergy questionnaires, skin test and challenge procedures were followed. RESULTS: One-thousand two-hundred and eighteen subjects, 69.8% of female, 51.7% of atopics, were included. 21.1% had a true beta-lactam allergy confirmed by skin tests (178, 69.3%) or by drug provocation (79, 30.7%). 17.4% of the patients with negative skin tests to major and minor penicillin determinants were positive for a beta-lactam. CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of beta-lactams allergy, if all skin tests are negative, skin tests with other determinants and provocation tests under strict surveillance are mandatory.
BACKGROUND:beta-lactams continue to remain the most commonly involved drug family in allergic drug reactions. They are often essential and there is a cost-effective and favourable risk-benefit ratio for the exploration of all suspicions of beta-lactamallergy. A firm diagnosis is always based on skin tests and sometimes on provocation tests. Recommendations have been published by allergy societies and distinguished scientists but they are not always concordant and can lead to some confusion for the practicing allergologist. The situation has even worsened since the world wide withdrawal of these penicillin determinants and since the predominance of amoxicillin and cephalosporin prescriptions in most countries. OBJECTIVE - METHOD: In a recent article, it was stated that patients with a penicillinallergy history and negative skin tests to major and minor penicillin determinants are at a low risk of relapse (0-5%) when receiving a beta-lactam. In this paper, our Drug Allergy and Hypersensitivity Database, a cohort database, was used to demonstrate that this statement is false. Standardized European Network for Drug Allergy questionnaires, skin test and challenge procedures were followed. RESULTS: One-thousand two-hundred and eighteen subjects, 69.8% of female, 51.7% of atopics, were included. 21.1% had a true beta-lactamallergy confirmed by skin tests (178, 69.3%) or by drug provocation (79, 30.7%). 17.4% of the patients with negative skin tests to major and minor penicillin determinants were positive for a beta-lactam. CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of beta-lactams allergy, if all skin tests are negative, skin tests with other determinants and provocation tests under strict surveillance are mandatory.
Authors: Kimberly G Blumenthal; Erica S Shenoy; Christy A Varughese; Shelley Hurwitz; David C Hooper; Aleena Banerji Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Shelley F Stone; Elizabeth J Phillips; Michael D Wiese; Robert J Heddle; Simon G A Brown Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.335