Literature DB >> 17975454

Functional outcome after peroneal nerve injury.

Ingrid L de Bruijn1, Jan H B Geertzen, Pieter U Dijkstra.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe muscle strength, ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) use, walking ability, participation and quality of life in patients with peroneal nerve injury. A historic cohort study (n=27) was performed with a median follow-up time of 61 months (inter quartile range 37-91). Muscle strength was assessed using the Medical Research Council scale. Perceived walking ability was assessed with the Walking Questionnaire. AFO use and problems in participation were assessed with a structured interview. The RAND-36 Health Survey was used to evaluate health-related quality of life. Muscle strength improved significantly during follow-up but 62% (16 of 26 patients, one missing value) of the patients still had paresis to some degree of ankle dorsiflexors. AFO use decreased significantly but 11% (n=3) still used an AFO at follow-up. Two-thirds (n=18) of the study population experienced some limitations in walking and climbing stairs. Decreased maximum walking distance was reported by 59 % (n=16). About half of the patients (n=13) reported some restrictions in leisure activities and 47% (n=9) of the patients with a paid job (n=19) experienced some restrictions in work. Scores on the domains physical functioning, mental health, vitality, bodily pain and general health perception of the RAND-36 were significantly lower compared with a Dutch reference group. Limitations in walking ability and participation are frequently present 5 years after peroneal nerve injury. Health-related quality of life was lower than in a reference group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17975454     DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f14444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  8 in total

1.  Risk factors for peroneal nerve injury and recovery in knee dislocation.

Authors:  Christopher J Peskun; Jas Chahal; Zvi Y Steinfeld; Daniel B Whelan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The incidence and clinical outcomes of peroneal nerve injuries associated with posterolateral corner injuries of the knee.

Authors:  T J Ridley; Mark A McCarthy; Matthew J Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The Course and Anatomical Characteristics of Sciatic and Femoral Nerves in Unilateral Crowe Type-IV Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Ping Song; Xiangpeng Kong; Minzhi Yang; Mingyang Ma; Wei Chai
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.755

4.  Is peroneal nerve injury associated with worse function after knee dislocation?

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Steven A Giuseffi; Scott A Kuzma; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Axon counts of potential nerve transfer donors for peroneal nerve reconstruction.

Authors:  Colin P White; Michael J Cooper; James R Bain; Carolyn M Levis
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

6.  Sciatic nerve course in adult patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip: implications for hip surgery.

Authors:  Ruiyu Liu; Jiawei Liang; Kunzheng Wang; Xiaoqian Dang; Chuanyi Bai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Transfer of Soleus Muscular Branch of Tibial Nerve to Deep Fibular Nerve to Repair Foot Drop After Common Peroneal Nerve Injury: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Bingbo Bao; Haifeng Wei; Hongyi Zhu; Xianyou Zheng
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Knee Dislocations: Lessons Learned From 20-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Robert C Schenck; Dustin L Richter; Daniel C Wascher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-05-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.