Literature DB >> 17975146

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene amplification in metastatic melanoma is a prognostic marker for patient survival, but not a predictive marker for chemosensitivity and chemotherapy response.

Selma Ugurel1, Roland Houben, David Schrama, Heike Voigt, Marc Zapatka, Dirk Schadendorf, Eva B Bröcker, Jürgen C Becker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is regarded as a key oncogene of the melanocytic lineage since it was detected by a genome-wide analysis to be strongly amplified in 15% to 20% of metastatic melanomas. MITF gene amplification was shown to be associated with a reduced survival in metastatic melanoma patients, and reduction of MITF activity was shown to sensitize melanoma cell lines to chemotherapeutics, suggesting the intratumoral MITF gene copy number as a predictive biomarker of response and survival after chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To validate this hypothesis, we investigated MITF gene amplification in tumor tissues obtained from 116 metastatic melanoma patients before an individualized sensitivity-directed chemotherapy using quantitative real-time PCR. MITF amplification rates were correlated with tumor chemosensitivity quantified by an ATP-based luminescence assay and with chemotherapy outcome in terms of response and survival.
RESULTS: Of 116 tumor tissues, 104 were evaluable for MITF gene amplification. Strong amplification (> or =4 copies per cell) was detected in 24 of 104 tissues (23%), whereas 62 of 104 tissues (60%) harbored >3 copies per cell. Strong MITF gene amplification was associated with a reduced disease-specific survival (P = 0.031). However, no correlation was found between MITF copy number and in vitro chemosensitivity or in vivo chemotherapy response.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that strong amplifications of the melanoma oncogene MITF affects patient survival but does not influence tumor chemosensitivity and chemotherapy response. Thus, the MITF gene copy number seems a useful prognostic marker in metastatic melanoma but could not be confirmed as a predictive marker of chemosensitivity and chemotherapy response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17975146     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  22 in total

1.  Inhibition of oncogenic BRAF activity by indole-3-carbinol disrupts microphthalmia-associated transcription factor expression and arrests melanoma cell proliferation.

Authors:  Aishwarya Kundu; Jeanne G Quirit; Michelle G Khouri; Gary L Firestone
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 2.  Cell-state dynamics and therapeutic resistance in melanoma from the perspective of MITF and IFNγ pathways.

Authors:  Xue Bai; David E Fisher; Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Evidence for an alternatively spliced MITF exon 2 variant.

Authors:  Jacinta L Simmons; Carly J Pierce; Glen M Boyle
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Absence of germline CDKN2A mutation in Sicilian patients with familial malignant melanoma: Could it be a population-specific genetic signature?

Authors:  Sara Di Lorenzo; Daniele Fanale; Bartolo Corradino; Valentina Caló; Gaetana Rinaldi; Viviana Bazan; Antonio Giordano; Adriana Cordova; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Guidelines for biomarker testing in metastatic melanoma: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  S Martín-Algarra; M T Fernández-Figueras; J A López-Martín; A Santos-Briz; A Arance; M D Lozano; A Berrocal; J J Ríos-Martín; E Espinosa; J L Rodríguez-Peralto
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for optimizing the therapeutic management of melanomas.

Authors:  Murielle Mimeault; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10

Review 7.  Circulating serologic and molecular biomarkers in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Shanique R Palmer; Lori A Erickson; Ilia Ichetovkin; Daniel J Knauer; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Molecular genetics and cellular features of TFE3 and TFEB fusion kidney cancers.

Authors:  Eric C Kauffman; Christopher J Ricketts; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Youfeng Yang; Maria J Merino; Donald P Bottaro; Ramaprasad Srinivasan; W Marston Linehan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  TFEB-amplified Renal Cell Carcinomas: An Aggressive Molecular Subset Demonstrating Variable Melanocytic Marker Expression and Morphologic Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Pedram Argani; Victor E Reuter; Lei Zhang; Yun-Shao Sung; Yi Ning; Jonathan I Epstein; George J Netto; Cristina R Antonescu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  Inside life of melanoma cell signaling, molecular insights, and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Sosman; Kim A Margolin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.