Literature DB >> 17974326

Poaching, enforcement, and the efficacy of marine reserves.

James E Byers1, Erik G Noonburg.   

Abstract

Marine reserves are promoted as an effective supplement to traditional fishery management techniques of harvest quotas and effort limitation. However, quantitative fishery models have ignored the impact of noncompliance (poaching). Here we link a model of a harvested fish population to a game-theoretic representation of fisherman behavior to quantify the effect of poaching on fishery yield and the enforcement effort required to maintain any desired level of reserve effectiveness. Although higher fish densities inside reserves will typically entice fishermen to poach, we show that the initial investment in enforcement efforts provides the greatest return on maintaining the benefits of the reserve to the fishery. Furthermore, we find that poaching eliminates the positive effect of fish dispersal on yield that is predicted by traditional models that ignore fisherman behavior. Our results broaden a fundamental insight from previous models of marine reserves, the effective equivalence of the harvest quota and reserve fraction, to the more realistic scenario in which fishermen attempt to maximize their economic payoffs.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17974326     DOI: 10.1890/07-0067.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  8 in total

1.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Crow White; Mark H Carr; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A global evaluation of coral reef management performance: are MPAs producing conservation and socio-economic improvements?

Authors:  Venetia Hargreaves-Allen; Susana Mourato; Eleanor Jane Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Marine protected areas in Costa Rica: How do artisanal fishers respond?

Authors:  Róger Madrigal-Ballestero; Heidi J Albers; Tabaré Capitán; Ariana Salas
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Changes in fish assemblages following the establishment of a network of no-take marine reserves and partially-protected areas.

Authors:  Brendan P Kelaher; Melinda A Coleman; Allison Broad; Matthew J Rees; Alan Jordan; Andrew R Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Derelict fishing line provides a useful proxy for estimating levels of non-compliance with no-take marine reserves.

Authors:  David H Williamson; Daniela M Ceccarelli; Richard D Evans; Jos K Hill; Garry R Russ
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rate of biological invasions is lower in coastal marine protected areas.

Authors:  A Ardura; F Juanes; S Planes; E Garcia-Vazquez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Illegal recreational fishing causes a decline in a fishery targeted species (Snapper: Chrysophrys auratus) within a remote no-take marine protected area.

Authors:  David Harasti; Tom R Davis; Alan Jordan; Luke Erskine; Natalie Moltschaniwskyj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Soft-bottom fishes and spatial protection: findings from a temperate marine protected area.

Authors:  Inês Sousa; Jorge M S Gonçalves; Joachim Claudet; Rui Coelho; Emanuel J Gonçalves; Karim Erzini
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.