O Wu1, N Bayoumi, M A Vickers, P Clark. 1. Section of Geriatric Medicine and Section of Public Health and Health Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Associations between vascular disease and ABO(H) blood groups have a long history, but no consensus exists regarding its magnitude and significance, or whether it relates to all disorders equally. An accurate calculation of risk would allow direct assessment of whether the effects of non-O status on thrombosis risk are of the magnitude predicted by its effect on von Willebrand factor/FVIII levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting associations with non-O blood groups. This gave pooled odds ratios of 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.36] for myocardial infarction (MI), 1.03 (95% CI 0.89-1.19) for angina, 1.45 (95% CI 1.35-1.56) for peripheral vascular disease, 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.27) for cerebral ischemia of arterial origin, and 1.79 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.05) for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, restriction to prospective MI studies only did not confirm the association (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.84-1.23), although these studies may have failed to capture early-onset disease. For VTE, using a combined group of OO/A(2)A(2)/A(2)O as index, the combination of A(1)A(1)/A(1)B/BB gave an OR of 2.44 (95% CI 1.79-3.33) and A(1)O/ BO/A(2)B an OR of 2.11 (95% CI 1.66-2.68). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the historical impression of linkage between some vascular disorders and non-O blood group status. Although the odds ratios are similar to those predicted by the effect of ABO(H) on von Willebrand factor levels, further work is required to assess risk prospectively and to refine the effect of reducing O(H) antigen expression on thrombosis. However, as non-O and particularly A(1)A(1), A(1)B, BB constitute a significant proportion of the population attributable fraction of VTE, there may be a role for more widespread adoption of ABO(H) typing in testing strategies.
BACKGROUND: Associations between vascular disease and ABO(H) blood groups have a long history, but no consensus exists regarding its magnitude and significance, or whether it relates to all disorders equally. An accurate calculation of risk would allow direct assessment of whether the effects of non-O status on thrombosis risk are of the magnitude predicted by its effect on von Willebrand factor/FVIII levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting associations with non-O blood groups. This gave pooled odds ratios of 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.36] for myocardial infarction (MI), 1.03 (95% CI 0.89-1.19) for angina, 1.45 (95% CI 1.35-1.56) for peripheral vascular disease, 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.27) for cerebral ischemia of arterial origin, and 1.79 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.05) for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, restriction to prospective MI studies only did not confirm the association (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.84-1.23), although these studies may have failed to capture early-onset disease. For VTE, using a combined group of OO/A(2)A(2)/A(2)O as index, the combination of A(1)A(1)/A(1)B/BB gave an OR of 2.44 (95% CI 1.79-3.33) and A(1)O/ BO/A(2)B an OR of 2.11 (95% CI 1.66-2.68). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the historical impression of linkage between some vascular disorders and non-O blood group status. Although the odds ratios are similar to those predicted by the effect of ABO(H) on von Willebrand factor levels, further work is required to assess risk prospectively and to refine the effect of reducing O(H) antigen expression on thrombosis. However, as non-O and particularly A(1)A(1), A(1)B, BB constitute a significant proportion of the population attributable fraction of VTE, there may be a role for more widespread adoption of ABO(H) typing in testing strategies.
Authors: Brian M Wolpin; Peter Kraft; Mousheng Xu; Emily Steplowski; Martin L Olsson; Alan A Arslan; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Myron Gross; Kathy Helzlsouer; Eric J Jacobs; Andrea LaCroix; Gloria Petersen; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Wei Zheng; Demetrius Albanes; Naomi E Allen; Laufey Amundadottir; Melissa A Austin; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Julie E Buring; Federico Canzian; Stephen J Chanock; J Michael Gaziano; Edward L Giovannucci; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Robert N Hoover; David J Hunter; Amy Hutchinson; Kevin B Jacobs; Charles Kooperberg; Julie B Mendelsohn; Dominique S Michaud; Kim Overvad; Alpa V Patel; Maria-José Sanchéz; Leah Sansbury; Xiao-Ou Shu; Nadia Slimani; Geoffrey S Tobias; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Paolo Vineis; Kala Visvanathan; Jarmo Virtamo; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Joanne Watters; Kai Yu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Patricia Hartge; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: John P Reilly; Nuala J Meyer; Michael G S Shashaty; Rui Feng; Paul N Lanken; Robert Gallop; Sandra Kaplan; Maximilian Herlim; Nathaniel L Oz; Isabel Hiciano; Ana Campbell; Daniel N Holena; Muredach P Reilly; Jason D Christie Journal: Chest Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: John P Reilly; Nuala J Meyer; Michael Gs Shashaty; Brian J Anderson; Caroline Ittner; Thomas G Dunn; Brian Lim; Caitlin Forker; Michael P Bonk; Ethan Kotloff; Rui Feng; Edward Cantu; Nilam S Mangalmurti; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Carmen Mikacenic; Keith R Walley; James Russell; David C Christiani; Mark M Wurfel; Paul N Lanken; Muredach P Reilly; Jason D Christie Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ian J Welsby; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Joseph P Mathew; Mark F Newman; Richard Becker; Sunil Rao; Carmelo A Milano; Mark Stafford-Smith Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.300