Literature DB >> 17973606

Implementing chronic disease self-management in community settings: lessons from Australian demonstration projects.

Caitlin F Francis1, Anne-Marie Feyer, Ben J Smith.   

Abstract

The evaluation of the Sharing Health Care Initiative addressed the translation of different models of chronic disease self-management into health and community service contexts in Australia. Across seven projects, four intervention models were adopted: (1) the Stanford Chronic Disease Self Management course; (2) generic disease management planning, training and support; (3) tailored disease management planning, training and support, and; (4) telephone coaching. Targeted recruitment through support groups and patient lists was most successful for reaching high-needs clients. Projects with well developed organisational structures and health system networks demonstrated more effective implementation. Engagement of GPs in recruitment and client support was limited. Future self-management programs will require flexible delivery methods in the primary health care setting, involving practice nurses or the equivalent. After 12 months there was little evidence of potential sustainability, although structures such as consumer resource centres and client support clubs were established in some locations. Only one project was able to use Medicare chronic disease-related items to integrate self-management support into routine general practice. Participants in all projects showed improvements in self-management practices, but those receiving Model 3, flexible and tailored support, and Model 4, telephone coaching, reported the greatest benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17973606     DOI: 10.1071/ah070499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Improving awareness, accountability, and access through health coaching: qualitative study of patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Clare Liddy; Sharon Johnston; Hannah Irving; Kate Nash; Natalie Ward
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure.

Authors:  John Petkov; Peter Harvey; Malcolm Battersby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Effects of a Web-based intervention for adults with chronic conditions on patient activation: online randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Solomon; Stephen L Wagner; James Goes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Why do GPs hesitate to refer diabetes patients to a self-management education program: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Patricia Sunaert; Marie Vandekerckhove; Hilde Bastiaens; Luc Feyen; Piet Vanden Bussche; Jan De Maeseneer; An De Sutter; Sara Willems
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Characteristics of a self-management support programme applicable in primary health care: a qualitative study of users' and health professionals' perceptions.

Authors:  Hilde Strøm Solberg; Aslak Steinsbekk; Marit Solbjør; Randi Granbo; Helge Garåsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Patient and provider acceptance of telecoaching in type 2 diabetes: a mixed-method study embedded in a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  I Odnoletkova; H Buysse; F Nobels; G Goderis; B Aertgeerts; L Annemans; D Ramaekers
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Health coaching in primary care: a feasibility model for diabetes care.

Authors:  Clare Liddy; Sharon Johnston; Kate Nash; Natalie Ward; Hannah Irving
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.