Literature DB >> 17972742

Involuntary capture of visual-spatial attention occurs for intersections, both real and "imagined".

Bryan R Burnham1, James H Neely.   

Abstract

In three spatial precuing experiments, we demonstrate attentional capture by an intersection that occurs (1) between two lines that are not part of an enclosed object, and (2) between a line in the cuing array that is not physically present during target search and the invisible circumference of a perceptual circle formed by the elements in the target array. This capture effect conceptually replicates Cole, Gellatly, and Blurton's (2001) corner enhancement effect, in which responses are faster for targets presented near an object's corners rather than along its straight edges. However, it extends that effect by showing that it occurs even when the intersection is not part of an enclosed object and is not physically present during target search. More important, our capture effect occurred even though the target's position was not designated by a perceptually distinctive feature and was not predicted by the intersection's position. Thus, it seems that a line intersection--whether it be real or imaginary-automatically captures visual-spatial attention, contrary to Folk, Remington, and Johnston's (1992) and Gibson and Kelsey's (1998) views that such an involuntary capture of spatial attention is contingent on attentional control settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972742     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention.

Authors:  G Cole; A Gellatly; A Blurton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Do intersections serve as basic features in visual search?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Jennifer S DiMase
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.

Authors:  B S Gibson; E M Kelsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  W F Bacon; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

10.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automatic and controlled attentional capture by threatening stimuli.

Authors:  R A Fabio; T Caprì
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.