Literature DB >> 17972737

Collaboration during visual search.

Kelly A Malcolmson1, Michael G Reynolds, Daniel Smilek.   

Abstract

Two experiments examine how collaboration influences visual search performance. Working with a partner or on their own, participants reported whether a target was present or absent in briefly presented search displays. We compared the search performance of individuals working together (collaborative pairs) with the pooled responses of the individuals working alone (nominal pairs). Collaborative pairs were less likely than nominal pairs to correctly detect a target and they were less likely to make false alarms. Signal detection analyses revealed that collaborative pairs were more sensitive to the presence of the target and had a more conservative response bias than the nominal pairs. This pattern was observed even when the presence of another individual was matched across pairs. The results are discussed in the context of task-sharing, social loafing and current theories of visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972737     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and 'top-top' control of action in cognitive experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Roepstorff; Chris Frith
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-02-05

Review 2.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Search performance without eye movements.

Authors:  R Klein; M Farrell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

Review 4.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Simon Garrod
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Harold Bekkering; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Independent attentional scanning in the separated hemispheres of split-brain patients.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard; G R Mangun; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.

Authors:  Mary Susan Weldon; Krystal D Bellinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard; G R Mangun; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  The wisdom of crowds for visual search.

Authors:  Mordechai Z Juni; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Influence of being videotaped on the prevalence effect during visual search.

Authors:  Yuki Miyazaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.