Literature DB >> 17972118

[Long-term results of fittig subperiosteal implants: report of twelve patient cases].

Stefan Zwerger1, Mario Hakim Abu-Id, Thomas Kreusch.   

Abstract

The subperiosteal dental implantation implant was orginally described in the 1940s. The inadequate long-term results of subperiosteal implants are in contrast to the excellent results documented for endosseus oral implants. Consequently, subperiosteal implants and other soft-tissue-anchored implants should not be used presently. The present report documented twelve patient cases with complications after treatment with subperiosteal implants. Typical complications of SI are implant exposure, inflammation, infection, fistula formation and implant mobility. After removing the SI severe atrophic bone was seen. The placement of osseointegrated oral implants was mostly not possible without autogenous bone grafting. The present report is in conclusion with other studies, that a regular control of patients with subperiosteal implants is necessary. Subperiosteal implants should definitely be removed, if continuous periods of complication occur. The complete oral rehabilitation requires further surgical treatment in the field of preprosthetic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972118     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-007-0081-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  9 in total

1.  Tripodal mandibular subperiosteal implant: basic sciences, operational procedures, and clinical data.

Authors:  L I Linkow; J R Wagner; M Chanavaz
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Forty years of experience with subperiosteal implant dentures in 41 edentulous patients.

Authors:  R L Bodine; R T Yanase; A Bodine
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant.

Authors:  S Schou; L Pallesen; E Hjørting-Hansen; C S Pedersen; B Fibaek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  [The atrophic jaw from the dental surgeon's point of view].

Authors:  H Obwegeser
Journal:  SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd       Date:  1977-09

Review 5.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Tooth replacement by oral endoprostheses: clinical aspects.

Authors:  P I Brånemark
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  The mandibular subperiosteal implant denture: a prospective survival study.

Authors:  R T Yanase; R L Bodine; J F Tom; S N White
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  A twenty-year evaluation of subperiosteal implants.

Authors:  L Young; J D Michel; D J Moore
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  A descriptive 18-year retrospective review of subperiosteal implants for patients with severely atrophied edentulous mandibles.

Authors:  Dorsey J Moore; Paul A Hansen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.426

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Medipix-based Spectral Micro-CT.

Authors:  Hengyong Yu; Qiong Xu; Peng He; James Bennett; Raja Amir; Bruce Dobbs; Xuanqin Mou; Biao Wei; Anthony Butler; Phillip Butler; Ge Wang
Journal:  CT Li Lun Yu Ying Yong Yan Jiu       Date:  2012-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.