Literature DB >> 1797209

Incomplete opening of LGM (Vena Tech) filters inserted via the transjugular approach.

R A Reed1, G P Teitelbaum, F C Taylor, R C Vogelzang, J W Yedlicka, M J Pentecost, W R Castaneda-Zuniga, K Amplatz.   

Abstract

Over a 12-month period, 216 LGM vena caval filters were placed in 216 patients at four institutions. The transjugular approach was used in 31 of 216 insertions (14%); 185 of 216 filters (86%) were inserted via the femoral route. Incomplete opening of filters was encountered in 13 of 31 transjugular insertions (41%) and none of 185 transfemoral insertions. Delayed spontaneous filter opening occurred in three of 12 cases (25%) of incomplete opening (in which follow-up was available) at 5 minutes, 4 days, and 2 months after insertion. One filter opened completely after catheter manipulations. Several mechanisms explaining this complication are proposed. In its present form, the LGM filter should not be inserted via the jugular route. Since the filtering capabilities of the incompletely opened LGM device have been shown to be diminished in vitro, it may be advisable to place a second filter cephalad to an incompletely opened LGM filter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1797209     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(91)72215-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  2 in total

1.  In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened Vena Tech-LGM vena caval filters.

Authors:  C D Korbin; R A Reed; F C Taylor; S P Kokoris; G P Teitelbaum
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Back to the Basics: Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Authors:  Brian Covello; Martin Radvany
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.