Literature DB >> 17972084

Acute alterations in anorectal manometry induced by proximal and distal sphincterotomy. Experimental studies on piglets.

Josimeire Batista Mehl1, Yvone A M V de Andrade Vicente, Roberto de Oliveira Dantas, Jorge Elias Junior, Carlos R Cambrea, Maria Cecília Rocha.   

Abstract

Anal incontinence causes psychological, social and adaptive troubles prejudicial to the quality of life both in children and adults. Therefore, the detailed knowledge of its causes and the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic methods increase the possibilities of a more adequate social life to patients with congenital anomalies or sphincteric lesions or degenerations. In this work, a manometric study was developed through an experimental model so as to analyze alterations in behavior of muscle groups responsible for the anorectal sphincteric mechanism, previous to and after proximal and distal lesions. Twenty-two pigs aged between 25 and 30 days, weighing 5-7 kg, were randomly divided into two groups. They were submitted to lesions of different levels in the anorectal muscle. The animals were studied by anorectal manometry (rectoanal inhibitory reflex and vector volume) before and after the lesions. The Student t test and the Wilcoxon test were applied for the statistical analyses, considered p <or= 0.05. The proximal lesion preserved sphincter relaxation, retarding its closure [speed of relaxation recovery 4.35 +/- 2.10 vs. 2.70 +/- 1.32 mm/s (p = 0.001)], but it reduced the maximum pressure [62.45 +/- 20.02 vs. 40.36 +/- 12.59 mmHg (p = 0.004)] and vector volume [2,749 +/- 921 vs. 1,591 +/- 1,379 mm Hg2 cm (p = 0.005)]. There was an increment in the high-pressure zone [5.09 +/- 1.04 vs. 6.36 +/- 1.50 mm (p = 0.005)], but the asymmetry percentage and the sphincter length were maintained. The distal lesion did not alter the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, the high-pressure zone length, the asymmetry percentage, or the vector volume. Nevertheless, the sphincter length increased [11.82 +/- 2.82 vs. 14.09 +/- 2.39 mm (p = 0.022)] and the maximum pressure decreased [60.55 +/- 22.05 vs. 40.91 +/- 13.41 mmHg (p = 0.004)]. The alterations observed due to proximal lesion of the anorectal sphincter suggest a direct and more important interference of the levator ani muscle in the function of the sphincteric musculature than that caused by the distal lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17972084     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-007-2031-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  26 in total

1.  Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash; S E Mathers; M M Henry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. III. The longitudinal anal muscle: anatomy and role in anal sphincter mechanism.

Authors:  A Shafik
Journal:  Invest Urol       Date:  1976-01

3.  Incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy: anatomic and functional evaluation.

Authors:  J García-Aguilar; C Belmonte Montes; J J Perez; L Jensen; R D Madoff; W D Wong
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery.

Authors:  A P Zbar; M Beer-Gabel; A C Chiappa; M Aslam
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Internal anal sphincter function following lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure: a long-term manometric study.

Authors:  Edward Ram; Dan Alper; Gideon Y Stein; Zachar Bramnik; Zeev Dreznik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  New method of measuring forces in the anal canal.

Authors:  C D Collins; B H Brown; G E Whittaker; H L Duthie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Anorectal physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; M M Schuster
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Animal model for the study of internal anal sphincter activity.

Authors:  I Vinograd; M Hanani; A Hadary; P Merguerian; S Nissan
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.745

9.  Anorectal complications of vaginal delivery.

Authors:  K S Venkatesh; P S Ramanujam; D M Larson; M A Haywood
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter.

Authors:  B M Taylor; R W Beart; S F Phillips
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.