Literature DB >> 1797207

LGM (Vena Tech) vena cava filter: clinical experience in 64 patients.

S F Millward1, J I Marsh, R A Peterson, P Rasuli, G French, C M Wilson, J E Tennenhouse, D C Morris, M E Simons, A F Formoso.   

Abstract

LG-Medical (LGM) vena cava filters were inserted percutaneously in 64 patients. Each case was followed after the filter insertion. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients; in 11 patients it was the only form of follow-up. Findings were available from autopsies in seven patients, plain abdominal radiographs in 42, and duplex sonograms of the insertion vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) in 46. A filter was inserted without major complication in all patients. The filter failed to open fully in four patients and was tilted in the IVC in 15. Recurrent pulmonary embolism was found in two patients (fatal in one), and inconsequential filter migration occurred in 11. Introduction vein thrombosis occurred in four patients. IVC thrombosis, demonstrated at autopsy or sonography, was found in 14 patients (22%) and was symptomatic in six (9%). This report suggests that the LGM filter is easy to introduce, and few complications are associated with insertion. The rate of caval thrombosis, however, may be higher than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1797207     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(91)72212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  1 in total

1.  Pulse-spray thrombolysis of inferior vena cava thrombosis complicating filter placement.

Authors:  M E Hansen; G L Miller; K C Starks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.