| Literature DB >> 17971775 |
E Yamamoto1, K Ino, E Miyoshi, K Shibata, N Takahashi, H Kajiyama, A Nawa, S Nomura, T Nagasaka, F Kikkawa.
Abstract
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) is an enzyme that catalyses beta1-6 branching of N-acetylglucosamine on asparagine-linked oligosaccharides of cell proteins. The present study aimed to investigate GnT-V expression and its prognostic significance in endometrial cancer. N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V expression was studied by immunohistochemistry in 74 surgically resected endometrial cancers, and the staining intensity was evaluated. High GnT-V expression in tumour cells was found in 43 (58.1%) of the 74 cases, and was positively correlated with advanced patient age, histological grade, and lymph vascular space involvement. Patients with high GnT-V expression had significantly impaired overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.0041 and P=0.0023, respectively) compared to patients with low expression of GnT-V. On multivariate analysis, GnT-V expression was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.0364). beta1-6 branching of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides was also detected in GnT-V-positive endometrial cancer cells by leukoagglutinating phytohaemagglutinin (L(4)-PHA) staining, and the molecular size of the major glycoproteins recognised by L(4)-PHA was approximately 60-200 kDa by lectin blot analysis. These results suggested that high GnT-V expression was correlated with an unfavourable clinical outcome, and that GnT-V is involved in the malignant potential of endometrial cancer by increasing the synthesis of beta1-6 branching of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17971775 PMCID: PMC2360248 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1GnT-V and β1–6 branching glycoprotein expression, and β1–6GlcNAc branching of β1 integrin in endometrial cancer tissues. (A) Western blot analysis with anti-GnT-V mAb. (B) Lectin blot analysis with L4-PHA. Lanes 1–7 corresponded to seven different endometrial cancer patients (G1, grade 1; G2, grade 2; G3, grade 3). P, JAR is a choriocarcinoma cell line used as a positive control for GnT-V expression; N, normal human uterine smooth muscle cells (UtSMC) as a negative control. (C) β1 integrin was immunoprecipitated from endometrial cancer tissues from three different patients. The amount of β1–6GlcNAc branching of β1 integrin was analysed by means of an L4-PHA lectin blot (upper panel). The membrane was reprobed with a specific mAb to β1 integrin (lower panel).
Figure 2Immunohistochemical staining patterns for GnT-V and staining of L4-PHA in endometrial cancers. Staining pattern of a tumour: (A) GnT-V low; (B and C) GnT-V high. (D–F) L4-PHA staining and (G–I) PCNA immunostaining were performed simultaneously with the same A, B, and C specimens, respectively. (J) Normal endometrial cells showed very faint or negative GnT-V expression. (K) Positive control for GnT-V (normal placenta). (L) Negative control. Original magnification, × 100.
Correlation of GnT-V expression with clinicopathological factors in endometrial cancer
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All cases | 74 | 31 (41.9%) | 43 (58.1%) | |
|
| ||||
| ⩽60 | 45 | 23 (51.1%) | 22 (48.9%) | 0.045 |
| >60 | 29 | 8 (27.6%) | 21 (72.4%) | |
|
| ||||
| I+II | 52 | 25 (48.1%) | 27 (51.9%) | 0.097 |
| III+IV | 22 | 6 (27.3%) | 16 (72.3%) | |
|
| ||||
| G1 | 28 | 17 (60.7%) | 11 (39.3%) | 0.011 |
| G2/G3 | 46 | 14 (30.4%) | 32 (69.6%) | |
|
| ||||
| Negative | 40 | 24 (60.0%) | 16 (40.0%) | <0.001 |
| Positive | 34 | 7 (20.6%) | 27 (79.4%) | |
|
| ||||
| N0 | 60 | 27 (45.0%) | 33 (55.0%) | 0.262 |
| N1 | 14 | 4 (28.6%) | 10 (71.4%) | |
|
| ||||
| 1/2> | 43 | 20 (46.5%) | 23 (53.5%) | 0.343 |
| 1/2⩽ | 31 | 11 (35.5%) | 20 (64.5%) | |
Abbreviations: FIGO=International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GnT-V=N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V.
χ2-test.
Figure 3Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curve drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method according to GnT-V expression in endometrial cancer patients. OS (A) and PFS (B) in all patients (n=74). Significant differences in OS (P=0.0041), and PFS (P=0.0023).
Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival in endometrial cancer patients
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age | ⩽60 | ||||
| >60 | 0.8046 | — | — | — | |
| FIGO surgical stage | I+II | ||||
| III+IV | <0.0001 | 2.922 | 0.639–13.362 | 0.1667 | |
| Histological grading | G1 | ||||
| G2/G3 | 0.1425 | — | — | — | |
| Lymph vascular invasion | Negative | ||||
| Positive | 0.0004 | 1.872 | 0.261–13.446 | 0.5329 | |
| Nodal status | N0 | ||||
| N1 | <0.0001 | 3.466 | 0.940–12.787 | 0.062 | |
| Myometrial invasion | 1/2> | ||||
| 1/2⩽ | 0.011 | 1.236 | 0.292–5.224 | 0.7734 | |
| GnT-V | Low | ||||
| High | 0.0041 | 6.053 | 0.649–56.452 | 0.5329 | |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; FIGO=International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GnT-V=N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V; HR=hazard ratio.
Log-rank test.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of progression-free survival in endometrial cancer patients
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age | ⩽60 | ||||
| >60 | 0.8643 | — | — | — | |
| FIGO surgical stage | I+II | ||||
| III+IV | <0.0001 | 3.049 | 0.997–9.327 | 0.0507 | |
| Histological grading | G1 | ||||
| G2/G3 | 0.0625 | — | — | — | |
| Lymph vascular invasion | Negative | ||||
| Positive | 0.0003 | 1.352 | 0.350–5.222 | 0.6616 | |
| Nodal status | N0 | ||||
| N1 | <0.0001 | 2.242 | 0.789–6.365 | 0.1295 | |
| Myometrial invasion | 1/2> | ||||
| 1/2⩽ | 0.0048 | 1.386 | 0.441–4.356 | 0.5761 | |
| GnT-V | Low | ||||
| High | 0.0023 | 4.164 | 1.095–15.840 | 0.0364 | |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; FIGO=International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GnT-V=N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V; HR=hazard ratio.
Log-rank test.