Literature DB >> 17970912

Noise-induced systematic errors in ratio imaging: serious artefacts and correction with multi-resolution denoising.

Yu-Li Wang1.   

Abstract

Ratio imaging is playing an increasingly important role in modern cell biology. Combined with ratiometric dyes or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensors, the approach allows the detection of conformational changes and molecular interactions in living cells. However, the approach is conducted increasingly under limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), where noise from multiple images can easily accumulate and lead to substantial uncertainty in ratio values. This study demonstrates that a far more serious concern is systematic errors that generate artificially high ratio values at low SNR. Thus, uneven SNR alone may lead to significant variations in ratios among different regions of a cell. Although correct average ratios may be obtained by applying conventional noise reduction filters, such as a Gaussian filter before calculating the ratio, these filters have a limited performance at low SNR and are prone to artefacts such as generating discrete domains not found in the correct ratio image. Much more reliable restoration may be achieved with multi-resolution denoising filters that take into account the actual noise characteristics of the detector. These filters are also capable of restoring structural details and photometric accuracy, and may serve as a general tool for retrieving reliable information from low-light live cell images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970912      PMCID: PMC3029016          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  10 in total

1.  Mean and variance of ratio estimators used in fluorescence ratio imaging.

Authors:  G M van Kempen; L J van Vliet
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  2000-04-01

Review 2.  Ratio imaging instrumentation.

Authors:  Kenneth Dunn; Frederick R Maxfield
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 3.  FRET imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jares-Erijman; Thomas M Jovin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Solid-state imagers for microscopy.

Authors:  R S Aikens; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 5.  Fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy.

Authors:  G R Bright; G W Fisher; J Rogowska; D L Taylor
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.441

6.  A novel 3D wavelet-based filter for visualizing features in noisy biological data.

Authors:  W C Moss; S Haase; J M Lyle; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain.

Authors:  Javier Portilla; Vasily Strela; Martin J Wainwright; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 10.856

8.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising.

Authors:  S G Chang; B Yu; M Vetterli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 9.  Fluorescent indicators of ion concentrations.

Authors:  R Y Tsien
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.441

10.  Fluorescence ratio imaging of cyclic AMP in single cells.

Authors:  S R Adams; A T Harootunian; Y J Buechler; S S Taylor; R Y Tsien
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Improved cytoplasmic pH measurements in SNARF-1 stained plant cells by image processing.

Authors:  Toshio Sano; Natsumaro Kutsuna; Seiichiro Hasezawa
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-04-30

2.  Biosensors for characterizing the dynamics of rho family GTPases in living cells.

Authors:  Louis Hodgson; Feimo Shen; Klaus Hahn
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03

3.  Localizing and extracting filament distributions from microscopy images.

Authors:  S Basu; C Liu; G K Rohde
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Evaluating the performance of time-gated live-cell microscopy with lanthanide probes.

Authors:  Megha Rajendran; Lawrence W Miller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Extraction of Individual Filaments from 2D Confocal Microscopy Images of Flat Cells.

Authors:  Saurav Basu; Gustavo Kunde Rohde
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Localizing and extracting filament distributions from microscopy images.

Authors:  S Basu; K N Dahl; G K Rohde
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 7.  Lanthanide-based imaging of protein-protein interactions in live cells.

Authors:  Megha Rajendran; Engin Yapici; Lawrence W Miller
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.165

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.