Literature DB >> 17970413

The differentiation of response numerosities in the pigeon.

Armando Machado1, Paulo Rodrigues.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined how pigeons differentiate response patterns along the dimension of number. In Experiment 1, 5 pigeons received food after pecking the left key at least N times and then switching to the right key (Mechner's Fixed Consecutive Number schedule). Parameter N varied across conditions from 4 to 32. Results showed that run length on the left key followed a normal distribution whose mean and standard deviation increased linearly with N; the coefficient of variation approached a constant value (the scalar property). In Experiment 2, 4 pigeons received food with probability p for pecking the left key exactly four times and then switching. If that did not happen, the pigeons still could receive food by returning to the left key and pecking it for a total of at least 16 times and then switching. Parameter p varied across conditions from 1.0 to .25. Results showed that when p= 1.0 or p=.5, pigeons learned two response numerosities within the same condition. When p=.25, each pigeon adapted to the schedule differently. Two of them emitted first runs well described by a mixture of two normal distributions, one with mean close to 4 and the other with mean close to 16 pecks. A mathematical model for the differentiation of response numerosity in Fixed Consecutive Number schedules is proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970413      PMCID: PMC1986432          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.41-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  How pigeons discriminate the relative frequency of events.

Authors:  R Keen; A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative numerosity discrimination in the pigeon: further tests of the linear-exponential-ratio model.

Authors:  Armando Machado; Richard Keen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Multiple-interval timing in rats: Performance on two-valued mixed fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  S Whitaker; C F Lowe; J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-10

4.  SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES.

Authors:  M RILLING; C MCDIARMID
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Probability Relations within Response Sequences under Ratio Reinforcement.

Authors:  F Mechner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  G Galbicka; K P Fowler; Z J Ritch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The modification of drug effects on behavior by external discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  V G Laties
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Numerosity discrimination: both time and number matter.

Authors:  J G Fetterman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1993-04

9.  Temporal integration in duration and number discrimination.

Authors:  W H Meck; R M Church; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-10

10.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Generalizing from the Past, Choosing the Future.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-06-11

2.  Human nonverbal discrimination of relative and absolute number.

Authors:  Lavinia Tan; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Optimal response rates in humans and rats.

Authors:  David M Freestone; Fuat Balcı; Patrick Simen; Russell M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Numerical averaging in mice.

Authors:  Ezgi Gür; Yalçın Akın Duyan; Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Evidence for a Mixed Timing and Counting Strategy in Mice Performing a Mechner Counting Task.

Authors:  Kenneth R Light; Brian Cotten; Talia Malekan; Sophie Dewil; Matthew R Bailey; Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.